Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 191048
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) <wolf31o2@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Renato Caldas <seventhguardian@gmail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
openal_ebuild.patch The ebuild patch that fixes it patch Renato Caldas 2007-09-02 12:42 0000 1.08 KB Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 191048 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 191048 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2007-09-02 12:40 0000 
I'm opening this bug report because of some fixes I've made originally to the
openal-0.0.8-r1 ebuild. They still apply to the 0.0.8-r2 ebuidl.

The fixes are to the use of the autotools, since openal inexplicably required
some ancient automake version. With the proper use of the autotools that bug is
fixed.

I forgot to open a bug report at the time, but did submit the ebuild to
portage-review. I apologise for that mistake. Anyway, here's the bug report.

------- Comment #1 From Renato Caldas 2007-09-02 12:42:17 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=129828) [details]
The ebuild patch that fixes it

This patch was originally made for 0.0.8-r1, but should apply cleanly to
0.0.8-r2

------- Comment #2 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-09-02 12:43:55 0000 ------- 
WANT_AUTOCONF=2.56 is not a legal value; 2.1 or latest is.

------- Comment #3 From Renato Caldas 2007-09-02 12:46:25 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #2)
> WANT_AUTOCONF=2.56 is not a legal value; 2.1 or latest is.

It was originally set to 2.5. So I guess "latest" it should be. Which means it
may probably be removed..

------- Comment #4 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2007-09-05 17:04:07 0000 ------- 
Updated in CVS... thanks for the patch...
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug