Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 189942
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Markus Dittrich <markusle@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 189942 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 189942 blocks: 189722
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2007-08-23 14:01 0000
Hi folks,

We've recently noticed the following issue with the 
eselect-{blas,cblas,lapack} modules. Presently,
eselect seems unable to re-select an already 
exisiting profile which makes it impossible to update
a user's system, e.g. after an upgrade which also 
changed the eselect profile for a particular module.

As a concrete example, the sci-team is currently
in the final stages of transitioning from "old-style"
blas/cblas/lapack to "new-style" ebuilds. With this upgrade
come enhanced eselect implementation files that
provide additional links for pkg-config as well as
header files. This means, that a user upgrading 
from old-style to new-style will need to re-select
their current blas/cblas/lapack-implementation after the emerge
to get these links or otherwise end up with a pretty 
crippled system.

Currently, this does not seem to be possible 

despina eselect # eselect blas set atlas                             
Implementation "atlas" already active for library directory "lib"!
Failed to switch to implementation "atlas" for library directory "lib"!
!!! Error: One or more actions have failed!

and the only workaround seems to be to delete 
in /etc/env.d/blas/lib/config and then re-select.
Could this be fixed or is there a way around this issue 
that we are not aware of?

Thanks a bunch for your help/comments,
Markus

------- Comment #1 From Donnie Berkholz 2007-08-25 04:29:11 0000 -------
It's my code, so I'll take the bug. It should indeed be possible. I think I
specifically disallowed that possibility in the code because I didn't see the
reason for it.

------- Comment #2 From Markus Dittrich 2007-08-25 12:24:02 0000 -------
Thanks for taking care of this Donnie!

best,
Markus

------- Comment #3 From Donnie Berkholz 2007-09-21 07:30:12 0000 -------
Just comment lines 56-59 in /usr/share/eselect/libs/skel.bash and give it a
try. If it works, I'll commit the change.

------- Comment #4 From Sébastien Fabbro 2007-09-21 08:42:45 0000 -------
> Just comment lines 56-59 in /usr/share/eselect/libs/skel.bash and give it a
> try. If it works, I'll commit the change.

works fine here.

------- Comment #5 From Markus Dittrich 2007-09-21 13:29:50 0000 -------
works fine here as well!

Thanks,
Markus

------- Comment #6 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-09-26 16:28:10 0000 -------
*** Bug 193884 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #7 From Donnie Berkholz 2007-10-15 09:38:54 0000 -------
I just talked to ciaranm, and he said it would be fine if I released the
skel.bash library independently of eselect. So I will put together an ebuild
for it.

------- Comment #8 From Markus Dittrich 2007-10-16 12:32:06 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> I just talked to ciaranm, and he said it would be fine if I released the
> skel.bash library independently of eselect. So I will put together an ebuild
> for it.
> 

Great and thanks for looking into this!

Best,
Markus

------- Comment #9 From Donnie Berkholz 2007-10-20 04:32:48 0000 -------
Heh, I didn't think this through clearly in advance. Releasing it as a separate
module accomplishes nothing to speed things up, because we still need a full
eselect release lacking it or they'll overwrite each other's files.

------- Comment #10 From Donnie Berkholz 2007-10-28 08:10:07 0000 -------
After further discussion with ciaranm, we've come to the conclusion that it
might just be best to allow that collision, pushing this into a separate
release without requiring a concomitant eselect release. Any thoughts?

------- Comment #11 From Donnie Berkholz 2007-12-04 20:33:02 0000 -------
Alright, the new eselect release (1.0.11) has this fix (finally). I think that
if I add a minimal dep on that to eselect{blas,cblas,lapack}, then things will
work out.

------- Comment #12 From Donnie Berkholz 2007-12-04 20:48:22 0000 -------
Guess I'll have to wait a month till eselect hits stable...

------- Comment #13 From Donnie Berkholz 2008-07-07 07:40:20 0000 -------
It's still not stable for some reason, but I'm closing this bug because it's
cluttering my list and it's fixed.

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug