Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 187465 - x11-libs/qt-3: possible remote code execution (CVE-2007-3388)
Summary: x11-libs/qt-3: possible remote code execution (CVE-2007-3388)
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 185446
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Security
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Vulnerabilities (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Security
URL: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-20...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-08-02 06:52 UTC by Max Lorenz
Modified: 2020-04-03 06:58 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Max Lorenz 2007-08-02 06:52:04 UTC
"... Several format string flaws were found in Qt error message handling. If an
application linked against Qt created an error message from user supplied
data in a certain way, it could lead to a denial of service or possibly
allow the execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2007-3388) ..."
from https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0721.html

Trolltech advisory:
http://trolltech.com/company/newsroom/announcements/press.2007-07-27.7503755960

patch:
http://dist.trolltech.com/developer/download/170529.diff

thanks.
Comment 1 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-08-02 16:47:26 UTC
To quote Dirk Müller from the KDE packager list:

In case you've missed it: I've added a patch for Qt4 as well to qt-copy. While 
TT claims that none of those are exploitable, I disagree and believe that 
some of them are indeed possible to exploit (though only in uninteresting 
ways as far as I investigated).


so qt-3.3.8-r3 and qt-4.3.0-r1 are in cvs now. Please go for it arch teams.
Comment 2 Caleb Tennis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-08-02 16:52:08 UTC
I thought there was already an open bug on this...

Anyway, arch teams note that the patch only modifies some debugging output statments via qWarning calls, so this should have absolutely no impact on stability whatsoever.
Comment 3 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-08-02 17:13:52 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> I thought there was already an open bug on this...

There is - once again restricted!? The issue was on the packager list on monday and in the public for at least 30 hours, so I thought you did not have the time and went ahead. :)
Comment 4 Caleb Tennis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-08-02 17:16:27 UTC
you're right, I didn't, so it's no problem.  :)

I just seem to remember it being a dupe.
Comment 5 Pierre-Yves Rofes (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-08-02 18:19:44 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 185446 ***