Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 187224
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Ivan Toshkov <ivan@toshkov.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 187224 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 187224 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2007-07-31 10:21 0000 
The file gtk-doc/files/61gtk-doc-gentoo.el is actually a gzip of the real file.
 After installing the package with USE=emacs, this file gets into
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-gentoo.el, which causes emacs to complain.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Add the `emacs' use flag to gtk-doc package
2. emerge =dev-util/gtk-doc-1.8-r1

Actual Results:  
$ file /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/61gtk-doc-gentoo.el 
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/61gtk-doc-gentoo.el: gzip compressed data, from Unix

Expected Results:  
# file /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/61gtk-doc-gentoo.el 
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/61gtk-doc-gentoo.el: ASCII English text

------- Comment #1 From Michael Mauch 2007-07-31 18:27:43 0000 ------- 
In case somebody searches for the error message, it is:

load-with-code-conversion: Symbol's value as variable is void: \213

------- Comment #2 From Ulrich Müller 2007-08-01 11:07:34 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 187336 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #3 From Ulrich Müller 2007-08-01 11:12:43 0000 ------- 
Fixed this, since it makes Emacs unusable.

------- Comment #4 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-08-01 22:23:42 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 187331 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #5 From Martin von Gagern 2007-08-03 13:32:16 0000 ------- 
Wouldn't a change to what files get actually installed usually warrant a
revision bump, so people don't have to bump into this bug to realize they have
to remerge that package?

------- Comment #6 From Christian Faulhammer 2007-08-06 06:35:49 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #5)
> Wouldn't a change to what files get actually installed usually warrant a
> revision bump, so people don't have to bump into this bug to realize they have
> to remerge that package?

 It should, yes.

------- Comment #7 From Christian Faulhammer 2007-08-06 06:36:35 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 187810 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #8 From Ulrich Müller 2007-08-10 19:26:14 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #5)
> Wouldn't a change to what files get actually installed usually warrant a
> revision bump, so people don't have to bump into this bug to realize they have
> to remerge that package?

You are absolutely right, my fault. Bumped to -r2 with unchanged ebuild.
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug