Here we go again... By classic gentoo-haskell herd style, we bundle up a few packages and kindly ask you to stabilize them. Please? :) They are all found under dev-haskell/ Stabilization request for the following Haskell packages, listed by arch: amd64 ----- alex-2.1.0 drift-2.2.0 haddock-0.8 happy-1.16 haxml-1.13.2 hmake-3.11 hppa ---- haddock-0.8 ppc --- alex-2.1.0 c2hs-0.14.5 cpphs-1.2 drift-2.2.0 haddock-0.8 happy-1.16 haxml-1.13.2 hmake-3.11 ppc64 ----- alex-2.1.0 drift-2.2.0 haddock-0.8 happy-1.16 haxml-1.13.2 sparc ----- alex-2.1.0 drift-2.2.0 haddock-0.8 happy-1.16 haxml-1.13.2 x86 --- alex-2.1.0 drift-2.2.0 haddock-0.8 happy-1.16 haxml-1.13.2 hmake-3.11
stable on ppc
x86 stable
x86 has to do alex-2.1.0 happy-1.16 again. Those need >=dev-haskell/cabal-1.1.6.1 too.
As yes, sorry we should have checked that. Some of those packages do depend on a later cabal. Could we therefore amend our request to include a later cabal too? Here's when each version went into portage: *cabal-1.1.6.2 (08 Jul 2007) *cabal-1.1.6.1 (07 Mar 2007) As you can see, 1.1.6.2 hasn't quite been in portage for 30 days, but it's a very minor change over 1.1.6.1 which we've been using for quite some time. ppc already picked 1.1.6.2. We will be asking for 1.1.6.2 to be marked stable anyway some time in the nearish future when we try to get ghc-6.6.1 and it's associated libs stable. So we leave it up to you which one to pick.
All good for sparc, using cabal-1.1.6.2
Stable for HPPA: dev-haskell/haddock-0.8
ppc64 stable
amd64 stable
