First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 18679
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Michael Imhof <tantive@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Gontran Zepeda <gontran@gontran.net>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
clustalw-1.83.ebuild clustalw-1.83.ebuild patch Gontran Zepeda 2003-04-03 04:05 0000 983 bytes Details | Diff
optimize-clustalw1.83.patch files/optimize-clustalw1.83.patch patch Gontran Zepeda 2003-04-03 04:06 0000 327 bytes Details | Diff
CLUSTALW distribution terms text/plain Gontran Zepeda 2003-04-04 03:09 0000 640 bytes Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 18679 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 18679 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2003-04-03 04:04 0000 
Multiple alignment is a crucial aspect of biological sequence analysis. 
Clustalw was the first widely used tool for this task, and continues to be of
use today.

DESCRIPTION="Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignmen
t through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix 
choice."

HOMEPAGE="http://www.embl-heidelberg.de/~seqanal/"

------- Comment #1 From Gontran Zepeda 2003-04-03 04:05:40 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=10145) [edit]
clustalw-1.83.ebuild

new ebuild

------- Comment #2 From Gontran Zepeda 2003-04-03 04:06:33 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=10146) [edit]
files/optimize-clustalw1.83.patch

for the files dir.

------- Comment #3 From Gontran Zepeda 2003-04-03 04:08:56 0000 ------- 
Package is NOT x86 only, contrary to my KEYWORDS assertion.

------- Comment #4 From Michael Imhof 2003-04-03 12:38:05 0000 ------- 
Ok, i checked in the ebuild to app-sci/clustalw.
I added a license file: licenses/clustalw and edited the ebuild to point to it.
I hope the section i included there actually IS the license. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I masked the ebuild for all archs. Please have a look and tell me if everything is ok, so I can unmask it.

------- Comment #5 From Gontran Zepeda 2003-04-04 03:08:34 0000 ------- 
Your changes look real good.  Thanks for the suggestion of license addition. 
You're more privy to the practice for licensing:  tell me, is it fair to
reference the license that's in the README in lieu of adding YAL (yet another
license) to the /usr/portage/license directory?  In the case that it's
<i>not</i>, I'll append the only obvious reference to licensing that I found in
the README, as an attachment.

------- Comment #6 From Gontran Zepeda 2003-04-04 03:09:23 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=10184) [edit]
distribution terms

possible license candidate file

------- Comment #7 From Michael Imhof 2003-04-05 07:46:07 0000 ------- 
Ok, changed the license according to your attachement.
I think it's the normal process to add licenses to licenses.
I unmasked it for x86.
Closing this bug now.

Thanks for your help!
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug