Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 186177
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Security <security@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Saleem Abdulrasool (RETIRED) <compnerd@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Flags: Requestee:
 
 
  ()

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 186177 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 186177 blocks:

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2007-07-22 02:52 0000 
gnome-screensaver installed +s when u+s should have been used.  This only
effects people who build it -pam.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:

------- Comment #1 From Saleem Abdulrasool (RETIRED) 2007-07-22 02:53:13 0000 ------- 
btw, this was brought to my attention by taviso.

------- Comment #2 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2007-07-22 07:54:14 0000 ------- 
gnome please fix this one.

------- Comment #3 From Gilles Dartiguelongue 2007-07-22 19:35:35 0000 ------- 
compnerd did it :)

------- Comment #4 From Gilles Dartiguelongue 2007-07-22 19:37:22 0000 ------- 
oops, that was for security herd.

------- Comment #5 From Pierre-Yves Rofes 2007-07-22 19:48:22 0000 ------- 
hmmm, did you do a stable bump? anyway, not sure which versions are affected or
not in the end, so please specify which version we should ask for going stable.

------- Comment #6 From Saleem Abdulrasool (RETIRED) 2007-07-25 01:58:22 0000 ------- 
yes, they were stable bumps -- all versions were effected.

------- Comment #7 From Pierre-Yves Rofes 2007-07-26 11:38:26 0000 ------- 
ok, but for the next security issues please use the normal stabilization
process to be sure that our users don't end with a br0ken app when upgrading,
either normally or with glsa-check. so, skipping directly to glsa decision. I
vote no.

------- Comment #8 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2007-07-26 15:21:51 0000 ------- 
I tend to vote NO.

------- Comment #9 From Raphael Marichez 2007-07-29 22:21:16 0000 ------- 
i vote No too. CLosing, feel free to reopen if you disagree.

@py: i am totally OK with direct stable bumps when the patch is trivial, which
is the case here.
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug