Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 185183
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Robin Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Matthias Vill <gentoo@cconstruct.de>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
chntpw-0.99.4.20070409.ebuild chntpw-0.99.4.20070409.ebuild text/plain Matthias Vill 2007-07-13 10:37 0000 982 bytes Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 185183 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 185183 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2007-07-13 10:36 0000
There is a new version with support for vista passwords.

I made a ebuild with amd64 support and wich builds the cpnt helper-prog.
(cpnt does copy without prior truncating files to avoid ntfs-driver-problems)

------- Comment #1 From Matthias Vill 2007-07-13 10:37:41 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=124740) [details]
chntpw-0.99.4.20070409.ebuild

------- Comment #2 From Alon Bar-Lev (RETIRED) 2007-07-13 17:04:39 0000 -------
Thanks.

1. Next time, please sumbit diff when creating something based on some old
file.
2. The cpnt is an internal utility, it has nothing to do with this package...
So I don't install it.
3. I will not add emulation layer into dependency.
4. I guess you are using amd64, I don't use this software so I cannot be sure
if I patch it correctly, but it should be easy to patch the source to work in
64bit... If you can do this it would be great, if not you can request upstream.
If you have a progress in this regards, please open a new bug with the patch.

------- Comment #3 From Matthias Vill 2007-07-14 12:23:18 0000 -------
Sorry, but you should use 0.99.4.20070409
old version said 0.99.3 in --help output this said 0.99.4 20070409

Thanks for quick response

------- Comment #4 From Alon Bar-Lev (RETIRED) 2007-07-14 17:25:14 0000 -------
Stupid versioning method...
Fixed.
Thanks!

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug