Bugzilla Bug 182056

After installing the great epix-1.0.24 for the first time, I noticed that the
Jay Belanger's major mode for editing ePiX files with emacs gets installed into
/usr/share/doc/epix-1.0.24/config/epix.el. 

Thus, it would be nice if we would have emacs-capability with an USE flag.

Created an attachment (id=123024) [details]
patch to add Emacs support and activate bash-completion

Here is a patch that will add optional Emacs support and optional installation
of bash-completion.  Site file will follow.

Created an attachment (id=123025) [details]
site file, to go to ${FILESDIR}

This will autoload the elisp files when needed

Dear sci team, when bumping, please add us to your prayers and fix the emacs
support, everything is here in form of patches.  Thanks.

Hi Christian,

Since I don't use emacs, could you please let me know if
these patches work smoothly with epix 1.1.15 which is
now in portage. If so, I'd gladly add it to the ebuild.

Thanks much for the good emacs work.

cheers,
Markus

(In reply to comment #4)
> Since I don't use emacs,

 You are doing badly wrong here. :)

> could you please let me know if
> these patches work smoothly with epix 1.1.15 which is
> now in portage. If so, I'd gladly add it to the ebuild.

 No, it won't work.  I will prepare a new patch, Emacs support has been changed
a lot. 

> Thanks much for the good emacs work.

 That's just team work.

> cheers,
> Markus

 Christian

Created an attachment (id=130523) [details]
patch to add Emacs support

Ok, bash_completion is gone.  I exchanged a generic make call by emake, it
worked here, so maybe you tend to add it.

(In reply to comment #6)
 > Ok, bash_completion is gone.  I exchanged a generic make call by emake, it
> worked here, so maybe you tend to add it.
> 

Thanks much - I just commited the patch to cvs.
It seems though that emacs is already needed
during the compile itself, so should virtual/emacs
rather go into DEPEND?

Thanks,
Markus

(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
>  > Ok, bash_completion is gone.  I exchanged a generic make call by emake, it
> > worked here, so maybe you tend to add it.
> > 
> Thanks much - I just commited the patch to cvs.
> It seems though that emacs is already needed
> during the compile itself, so should virtual/emacs
> rather go into DEPEND?

 You are right.

Thanks, I've changed the ebuild accordingly.

Hi, thanks for your efforts. 

Unfortunately, as you probably noticed, the USE="emacs" fails; see bug #192283.