Bug 181792 – dev-libs/nss-3.11.9: Ignored LDFLAGS: 6 files

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) 2007-06-12 16:53:20 UTC]

### List of files built with LDFLAGS ignored ###
/usr/lib/nss/libnssckbi.so.11
/usr/lib/nss/libfreebl3.so.11
/usr/lib/nss/libnss3.so.11
/usr/lib/nss/libsmime3.so.11
/usr/lib/nss/libsoftokn3.so.11
/usr/lib/nss/libssl3.so.11
### End of list                              ###

Ignoring LDFLAGS increases files sizes and decreases performance.

[Comment 1 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-06-12 17:48:22 UTC]

OK, that was about enough.

1/ Use common sense when filing bugs (like, what about mailing gentoo-dev mailing list first and asking about the best course of action here?
2/ If you have a patch, submit it *upstream* unless this is a *Gentoo-specific* issue.

[Comment 2 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) 2008-02-13 00:21:08 UTC]

Created attachment 143373 [details, diff]
nss-3.11.9-respect-LDFLAGS.patch

[Comment 3 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) 2008-02-13 00:21:27 UTC]

I have attached the patch.

[Comment 4 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) 2008-03-08 17:55:55 UTC]

Created attachment 145579 [details, diff]
nss-3.12-respect-LDFLAGS.patch

[Comment 5 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) 2008-03-08 22:38:34 UTC]

We currently don't have any policy that says we can't ignore LDFLAGS.  I'd much rather this be discussed on g-dev@ before we start enforcing a policy that doesn't exist.  Thanks

[Comment 6 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) 2008-08-13 16:44:03 UTC]

Fixed, thanks.