First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 181790
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Mozilla Gentoo Team <mozilla@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
nspr-4.7.1-respect-LDFLAGS.patch nspr-4.7.1-respect-LDFLAGS.patch patch Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis 2008-02-12 23:58 0000 280 bytes Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 181790 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 181790 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2007-06-12 16:50 0000 
### List of files built with LDFLAGS ignored ###
/usr/lib/nspr/libplc4.so.6
/usr/lib/nspr/libnspr4.so.6
/usr/lib/nspr/libplds4.so.6
### End of list                              ###

Ignoring LDFLAGS increases files sizes and decreases performance.

------- Comment #1 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-06-12 17:48:22 0000 ------- 
OK, that was about enough.

1/ Use common sense when filing bugs (like, what about mailing gentoo-dev
mailing list first and asking about the best course of action here?
2/ If you have a patch, submit it *upstream* unless this is a *Gentoo-specific*
issue.

------- Comment #2 From Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis 2008-02-12 17:20:49 0000 ------- 
### List of files containing .hash section ###
/usr/lib/nspr/libplds4.so.7
/usr/lib/nspr/libplc4.so.7
/usr/lib/nspr/libnspr4.so.7
### End of list                            ###

------- Comment #3 From Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis 2008-02-12 23:58:52 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=143372) [details]
nspr-4.7.0-respect-LDFLAGS.patch

------- Comment #4 From Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis 2008-02-12 23:59:11 0000 ------- 
I have attached the patch.

------- Comment #5 From Mark Loeser 2008-03-08 22:38:08 0000 ------- 
We currently don't have any policy that says we can't ignore LDFLAGS.  I'd much
rather this be discussed on g-dev@ before we start enforcing a policy that
doesn't exist.  Thanks

------- Comment #6 From Raúl Porcel 2008-08-13 19:25:59 0000 ------- 
Fixed
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug