While the tarball distributed by kitware contains a cmake-mode for emacs and syntax/autoindent files for vim, they aren't installed and do not have use flags. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. emerge -pv cmake 2. note the lack of emacs and vim-syntax USE flags 3. cry
Created attachment 120982 [details] new cmake-2.4.6 ebuild Add USE=emacs and USE=vim-syntax to cmake ebuild.
Created attachment 120983 [details] sitefile for emacs cmake-mode
Created attachment 120984 [details] ftdetect file for vim syntax highlighting emacs is my editor of choice, so I'm not 100% on how vim does things. I did install vim and test this against a CMakeLists.txt file, but there could be pitfalls here I'm not aware of.
Concerning the Emacs part, please fix the following: 1. pkg_post{inst,rm} should have: use emacs && elisp-site-regen 2. Use "add-to-list" for load-path and auto-mode-alist 3. Please don't "require" or "load" packages in your site-init files. Use the autoload mechanism whereever possible. See bug #174469 and <http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/emacs/wiki/sitefile%20problems> for further explanation.
Created attachment 120991 [details] ebuild that doesn't try to elisp-site-regen when USE="-emacs"
Created attachment 120992 [details] fixed sitefile for cmake-mode that uses the autoload system
(In reply to comment #6) > Created an attachment (id=120992) [edit] > fixed sitefile for cmake-mode that uses the autoload system Looks good to me. Also the ebuild, as far as Emacs is concerned. I can't speak for vi, though.
(In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Created an attachment (id=120992) [edit] > > fixed sitefile for cmake-mode that uses the autoload system > Looks good to me. Also the ebuild, as far as Emacs is concerned. > I can't speak for vi, though. We will ask them... KDE team: If you don't incorporate the fixes or speak against them, we will aplly them in two weeks time.
(In reply to comment #8) > KDE team: If you don't incorporate the fixes or speak against them, we will > aplly them in two weeks time. Let's hear the vim guys first, shall we? :-) (Btw, last time I checked, the kde herd was responsive (q. e. d. ;-) ) to such requests so I don't see the need for a deadline yet.)
At a glance, the vim stuff looks good to me. Don't have time to test it now, though.
I've implemented the changes in -r1 which I've just committed to CVS. Thanks, Jack, for bringing this to our attention and to my fellow devs for reviewing the emacs and vim parts.
