Bug 179098 – Allow www-client/mozilla-firefox-bin as dep for x11-plugins/noscript

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Pat Double 2007-05-19 12:46:41 UTC]

x11-plugins/noscript is an extension for Firefox. Its dep is www-client/mozilla-firefox. If I have www-client/mozilla-firefox-bin merged and attempt to merge x11-plugins/noscript it will pull in www-client/mozilla-firefox which is not what I want.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge www-client/mozilla-firefox-bin
2. emerge x11-plugins/noscript
Actual Results:  
Attempt to merge www-client/mozilla-firefox

Expected Results:  
x11-plugins/noscript should be happy and merge with www-client/mozilla-firefox-bin

I have modified the ebuild of x11-plugins/noscript to depend on either www-client/mozilla-firefox or www-client/mozilla-firefox-bin and it does work.

[Comment 1 Pat Double 2007-05-19 12:50:49 UTC]

I tried to update the ebuild but got a bugzilla error:

# Copyright 1999-2007 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/x11-plugins/noscript/noscript-1.1.4.8.070430.ebuild,v 1.1 2007/05/04 17:09:39 armin76 Exp $

inherit mozextension multilib

DESCRIPTION="Firefox plugin to disable javascript"
HOMEPAGE="http://noscript.net/"
SRC_URI="http://software.informaction.com/data/releases/${P}.xpi"

LICENSE="GPL-2"
SLOT="0"
KEYWORDS="~alpha ~amd64 ~arm ~hppa ~ia64 ~mips ~ppc ~ppc64 ~sparc ~x86"
IUSE=""

RDEPEND="|| (
        >=www-client/mozilla-firefox-bin-1.5.0.7
        >=www-client/mozilla-firefox-1.5.0.7
)"
DEPEND="${RDEPEND}"

S=${WORKDIR}

src_unpack() {
        xpi_unpack "${P}".xpi
}

src_install() {
        declare MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME
        if has_version '>=www-client/mozilla-firefox-1.5.0.7'; then
                MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME="/usr/$(get_libdir)/mozilla-firefox"
        elif has_version '>=www-client/mozilla-firefox-bin-1.5.0.7'; then
                MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME="/opt/firefox"
        fi

        xpi_install "${S}"/"${P}"
}

[Comment 2 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) 2007-05-22 11:22:43 UTC]

What if you have both?

I know it would be easy to do, but i don't think they should get installed on both if that is the case.

Thoughts?

[Comment 3 Pat Double 2007-05-22 15:11:04 UTC]

Why not both?

[Comment 4 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) 2007-06-13 12:42:07 UTC]

Fixed, thanks.