First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 177748
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Default Assignee for Orphaned Packages <maintainer-needed@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Ed Catmur <ed@catmur.co.uk>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
pam-include-not-pam_stack.patch pam-include-not-pam_stack.patch patch Ed Catmur 2007-05-14 05:18 0000 1.50 KB Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 177748 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 177748 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2007-05-09 05:42 0000 
/etc/pam.d/esmtp and /etc/pam.d/webmail have:

auth       required     pam_stack.so service=system-auth
account    required     pam_stack.so service=system-auth
session    required     pam_stack.so service=system-auth

This breaks with sys-libs/pam-0.99.7.1, where pam_stack is removed.

These should be:

auth       include      system-auth
account    include      system-auth
session    include      system-auth

------- Comment #1 From Ed Catmur 2007-05-14 05:18:04 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=119176) [edit]
pam-include-not-pam_stack.patch

Patch.

------- Comment #2 From Laurence Withers 2007-06-11 19:37:39 0000 ------- 
I can confirm that when upgrading PAM to 0.99.7.1, courier does stop working
due to pam_stack.so no longer being available. Changing the files in /etc/pam.d
according to the patch also fixes the problem (I can now send/receive email
correctly).

A quick google search shows up
http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev%40gentoo.org/msg05454.html , which
explains that pam_stack was a non-standard module deprecated in favour of the
"include" control statement introduced in linux-pam-0.78. Both have the
identical result of including the rules from another file in /etc/pam.d.

------- Comment #3 From Diego Pettenò 2007-07-04 19:56:27 0000 ------- 
I've applied it in a revbump of both ~arch and stable, in light of the plans
for stabling Linux-PAM 0.99.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug