Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 17547
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: George Shapovalov <george@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Adam Tenderholt <a-tenderholt@northwestern.edu>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
xdrawchem-1.6.8.ebuild Ebuild for xdrawchem-1.6.8 (new version) text/plain Adam Tenderholt 2003-03-15 03:16 0000 826 bytes Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 17547 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 17547 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2003-03-15 03:14 0000 
XdrawChem 1.6.8 is out!! Attached is the new ebuild. 
 
Adam

------- Comment #1 From Adam Tenderholt 2003-03-15 03:16:06 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=9408) [details]
Ebuild for xdrawchem-1.6.8 (new version)

------- Comment #2 From George Shapovalov 2003-04-25 03:59:16 0000 ------- 
Hi Adam.

Thanks for your submission!
I have processed and committed the ebuild. Pleasee test.
Also, I see there are quite a few ebuilds accumulated already. Should we remove some of those and if yes, what would be your pick? (basically, are there any issues why we should keep 1.4 and 1.5 versions?)

George

------- Comment #3 From Adam Tenderholt 2003-04-26 15:15:17 0000 ------- 
It merges fine on my machine. I'd say it's safe to remove the 1.4.2 and 1.5
ebuilds from portage. 

Also, xdrawchem 1.6.9 was released about 2 weeks ago...I don't know how long
until another release. Should I make a 1.6.9 ebuild?

Adam

------- Comment #4 From George Shapovalov 2003-07-22 18:55:33 0000 ------- 
ok, this has long been stable already

------- Comment #5 From Stephane Loeuillet 2003-10-01 08:33:23 0000 ------- 
1.7.5 in portage

time to close ?

------- Comment #6 From George Shapovalov 2003-11-08 23:29:57 0000 ------- 
Indeed. This reopening was result of a generous care by bugzilla when it
was last reconfigured :).
reclosing.
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug