First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 175284
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: AMD64 Project <amd64@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Vlastimil Babka (Caster) <caster@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 175284 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 175284 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2007-04-19 22:50 0000 
In tree since 10 Mar, no bugs that would be regression of current stable
1.5.0.3.

------- Comment #1 From Markus Rothe 2007-04-20 19:02:42 0000 ------- 
unfortunately the ppc64 tarball seems broken:

$ cd /tmp && tar xfvz
/usr/portage/distfiles/ibm-java2-sdk-5.0-4.0-linux-ppc64.tgz
[...]
ibm-java2-ppc64-50/lib/tools.jar

gzip: stdin: unexpected end of file
tar: Unexpected EOF in archive
tar: Unexpected EOF in archive
tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now


I've downloaded twice and digest are the same as in portage.. hmm.. what to do?

------- Comment #2 From Vlastimil Babka (Caster) 2007-04-20 19:58:34 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #1)
> unfortunately the ppc64 tarball seems broken:

Weird, it works just fine here

> I've downloaded twice and digest are the same as in portage.. hmm.. what to do?

I downloaded it when the package is added, but digest is also still fine so you
should have the same file. It's 68878329 bytes long.

------- Comment #3 From Markus Rothe 2007-04-21 06:23:44 0000 ------- 
must be late yesterday... ^^ now everything works. ppc64 stable

------- Comment #4 From Tobias Scherbaum 2007-04-22 18:14:07 0000 ------- 
ppc stable

------- Comment #5 From Christian Faulhammer 2007-04-23 08:31:30 0000 ------- 
x86 stable

------- Comment #6 From Vlastimil Babka (Caster) 2007-06-08 19:50:31 0000 ------- 
Wake up, Neo.

------- Comment #7 From Wulf Krueger (RETIRED) 2007-06-10 20:40:11 0000 ------- 
It's Philantrop, not Neo, pleased to meet you! ;-)

Marked stable on amd64. We're last, so I'm, well, you know by now... Fixed. And
now no more whining about amd64! ;-)
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug