First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 17284
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Adrian Almenar <aalmenar@gmail.com>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Buddy Brewer <buddy@buddybrewer.com>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
junit-3.7-r1.ebuild This one works for me. No src_compile() stanza. text/plain Buddy Brewer 2003-03-13 09:26 0000 776 bytes Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 17284 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 17284 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2003-03-10 23:52 0000 
Looks like junit3.7 is missing a build.xml: 
 
  inflating: junit/ui/TestRunner.java 
>>> Source unpacked. 
Buildfile: build.xml does not exist! 
Build failed 
 
I was able to get the 3.7-r1 ebuild to install by removing the src_compile section, 
since junit.jar is already built and included in the dist anyway.  At first glance, 
junit-3.8.1 (currently masked) appears to have a build.xml in src.jar.  I haven't 
unmasked and installed 3.8.1 though, so I can't say for sure whether/not it works.

------- Comment #1 From Buddy Brewer 2003-03-13 09:26:11 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=9343) [edit]
This one works for me.	No src_compile() stanza.

Attaching the .ebuild that worksforme, for good measure :)  The only difference
between the attachment and what's currently in portage is that the src_compile
stanza is gone.

------- Comment #2 From Dylan Carlson (RETIRED) 2003-03-14 00:34:20 0000 ------- 
Fixed.  Even though I'm sure there's no difference between the shipped
junit.jar bytecode and 
the newly compiled one -- it's the principle of the thing.  Added
files/junit-3.7-build.xml and 
bumped it. 

Cheers
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug