Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 1726
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Maarten Thibaut <murphy@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Maarten Thibaut <murphy@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
patch-2.5.4-r3.ebuild.diff Diff that adds support for sparc32 archs with 64 bit filehandles patch Maarten Thibaut 2002-04-13 08:53 0000 61 bytes Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 1726 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 1726 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2002-04-13 08:00 0000 
On SPARC machines where a 32 bit architecture is chosen in userland, patch does
not compile correctly for 64 bit filehandles. It assumes 32 bit filehandles instead.

The error produced is:

patch: **** fseek : Invalid argument

Adding this line in the ebuild before try ./configure fixes the issue:

CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500"; export CFLAGS

------- Comment #1 From Maarten Thibaut 2002-04-13 08:53:20 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=552) [details]
Diff that adds support for sparc32 archs with 64 bit filehandles

------- Comment #2 From Scott A. Friedman 2002-04-15 12:03:23 0000 ------- 
The associated mask for this fix is jamming some people!

I have patch-r3 and the you are requiring -r4 somehow rsync is not downloading 
the r4 ebuild? I am not sure what is going on here see gentoo-user. I got 
around it by manually changing the /etc/make.profile/packages file to -r3

------- Comment #3 From Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) 2002-04-18 09:26:19 0000 ------- 
What is the status on this Maarten?  And is it related to bug #56 in any way?
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug