First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 170492
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Robin Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Craig (Security Padawan) <craig@haquarter.de>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
tw_cli-9.4.0.1.ebuild ebuild for sys-block/tw_cli-9.4.0.1 text/plain Craig (Security Padawan) 2007-03-11 21:09 0000 1.94 KB Details
patch diff -u output from sys-block/tw_cli-9.4.0 to sys-block/tw_cli-9.4.0.1 text/plain Craig (Security Padawan) 2007-03-11 21:11 0000 2.69 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 170492 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 170492 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2007-03-11 21:08 0000 
Version bump to 9.4.0.1 + I cleaned up the ebuild a bit, e.g. src_unpack() and
MY_P weren't really needed, I changed "DOWNLOAD_URL" to "LICENSE_URL" and the
ebuild now prints out the command to fetch the correct tarball to the
${DISTDIR}; it's simply more userfriendly that way :)
In my opinion the ebuild is much more easier to read/understand now.

------- Comment #1 From Craig (Security Padawan) 2007-03-11 21:09:55 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=113007) [edit]
ebuild for sys-block/tw_cli-9.4.0.1

------- Comment #2 From Craig (Security Padawan) 2007-03-11 21:11:13 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=113008) [edit]
patch from sys-block/tw_cli-9.4.0 to sys-block/tw_cli-9.4.0.1

------- Comment #3 From Craig (Security Padawan) 2007-03-11 21:14:44 0000 ------- 
I also uploaded the "diff -u" output so that you can easily see what I changed.
I hope it's ok this way.

------- Comment #4 From Wolfram Schlich 2007-03-23 23:14:01 0000 ------- 
IIRC there was an issue with using ARCH-specific variables in SRC_URI
(can't remember what it was exactly, though).
I talked to Robin about that quite a while ago...
Robin?

------- Comment #5 From Craig (Security Padawan) 2007-03-24 10:50:03 0000 ------- 
I don't see any reason why it shouldn't work?!
Well, I'll try it monday, if I've got time then. (If you don't know it: Robin
is in devaway status till 26th).

------- Comment #6 From Robin Johnson 2007-04-01 19:36:45 0000 ------- 
Craig: you CANNOT use $ARCH inside SRC_URI, because then the computed contents
of SRC_URI are different by arch, and if I generate the Manifest on x86, you
will not be able to verify it on amd64.

------- Comment #7 From Robin Johnson 2007-04-01 20:05:36 0000 ------- 
9.4.0.1 and 9.4.1 in the tree now.

------- Comment #8 From Craig (Security Padawan) 2007-04-01 21:46:46 0000 ------- 
Cool! And thanks for the explanation about SRC_URI. :)
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug