Bugzilla Bug 170323

I've been contacted by upstream (Xiph) regarding the "Xiph BSD license", which
is in reality just a cosmetic variation of the "BSD" license.

Here's my final email to upstream regarding the matter:

"Since the "Xiph BSD" license as we have it[1] is simply filling in the
placeholders on the BSD license[2], I'm going to change all the ebuilds using
"xiph" to "BSD", as was originally suggested.

We're not going to keep different BSD-variant licenses when the only thing that
is different is the copyright owner.

If Xiph does have a derivative license that varies in more than cosmetics, then
yes, we'll put that in the tree and change the licenses.

Steve

1.
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/licenses/xiph?rev=1.1&view=markup

2.
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/licenses/BSD?rev=1.4&view=markup"

Affected ebuilds that need to be converted from 'xiph' to 'BSD':

app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-10.2
media-libs/libtheora-1.0_alpha6-r1
media-libs/libtheora-1.0_alpha7
media-sound/positron-1.1

(In reply to comment #0)
> Affected ebuilds that need to be converted from 'xiph' to 'BSD':
> 
> app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-10.2
> media-libs/libtheora-1.0_alpha6-r1
> media-libs/libtheora-1.0_alpha7
> media-sound/positron-1.1

Fixed in CVS