First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 169368
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Developer Relations Team <devrel@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Simon Stelling (RETIRED) <blubb@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 169368 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 169368 blocks:

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2007-03-04 21:17 0000
Please prevent ciaranm@ciaranm.org from sending mails to any gentoo mailing
list. For reasons, please see the various threads on the -dev and -core mailing
lists. I don't feel capable of summarizing all of them here.

------- Comment #1 From solar 2007-03-04 21:20:29 0000 -------
Other than the large number of resources it has taken and continues to waste. 
You will have to justify this request somehow. 

------- Comment #2 From Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) 2007-03-04 21:36:20 0000 -------
just to note that these two are tied together.  when this becomes a policed
distro, I will want no part of it, so I respectfully request infra to retire me
simultaneous to any banning.

------- Comment #3 From Timothy Redaelli 2007-03-04 21:41:06 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> just to note that these two are tied together.  when this becomes a policed
> distro, I will want no part of it, so I respectfully request infra to retire me
> simultaneous to any banning.
I agree with you

------- Comment #4 From Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) 2007-03-04 21:42:40 0000 -------
apparently, blubb tells me that people are under the impression he wants to get
rid of me.  I know of no such intention on his part.  It was I who added to the
bug's summary, and bugzilla's bug record will show that.

------- Comment #5 From Alexander Færøy 2007-03-04 21:45:06 0000 -------
Infra: please put this on a hold. There is a lot of discussion about this right
now and it's not everyone who would back this up.

------- Comment #6 From Stefan Cornelius (RETIRED) 2007-03-04 21:49:31 0000 -------
I'm completely against censorship of any kind. You are free to not read his
emails, but banning him (or anybody else) is nothing I will support.

> For reasons, please see the various threads on the -dev and -core mailing
> lists.

You know what? I'm following threads only once in a while, I would ban 70% of
all posters there. Reading -core and -dev is worse than reading spam, anyways.

------- Comment #7 From Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) 2007-03-04 21:49:56 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> Please prevent ciaranm@ciaranm.org from sending mails to any gentoo mailing
> list.

No.

------- Comment #8 From Fernando J. Pereda 2007-03-04 21:54:28 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> Please prevent ciaranm@ciaranm.org from sending mails to any gentoo mailing
> list.

No.

------- Comment #9 From René Nussbaumer 2007-03-04 21:56:48 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> Please prevent ciaranm@ciaranm.org from sending mails to any gentoo mailing
> list. For reasons, please see the various threads on the -dev and -core mailing
> lists. I don't feel capable of summarizing all of them here.

No.

------- Comment #10 From Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2007-03-04 22:07:26 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Other than the large number of resources it has taken and continues to waste. 
> You will have to justify this request somehow. 

You already named my main reason. I think Gentoo would work a lot more
efficient without his participation. The vast amount of time lost over the
trouble he constantly causes is not worth it in my opinion.

------- Comment #11 From Jakub Moc 2007-03-04 22:11:01 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> You already named my main reason. I think Gentoo would work a lot more
> efficient without his participation. The vast amount of time lost over the
> trouble he constantly causes is not worth it in my opinion.

+1 

(Oh, btw there's a bugzilla voting feature; if this was meant as voting for
some reason maybe infra could turn it on temporarily :P)

------- Comment #12 From solar 2007-03-04 22:11:45 0000 -------
People. This is not a YES or NO bug. This is not a bug to make idle threats
about if somebody gets removed from a service you will quit. People have been
unsubscribed/removed from services in the past and I'm sure more people in the
future will also. blubb filed it. He alone has to justify it before any action
can/will be taken and chances are infra would work with devrel on if it is the
right/wrong decision. 

If a flamewar is brought to this bug you will likey find yourself removed from
bugzilla. So don't do it!

------- Comment #13 From Lars Weiler (RETIRED) 2007-03-04 22:46:01 0000 -------
This is not an infra bug as long as you are only discussing here.  Reassigning.

------- Comment #14 From Pacho Ramos 2007-03-05 19:20:23 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Other than the large number of resources it has taken and continues to waste. 
> > You will have to justify this request somehow. 
> 
> You already named my main reason. I think Gentoo would work a lot more
> efficient without his participation. The vast amount of time lost over the
> trouble he constantly causes is not worth it in my opinion.
> 

+1

------- Comment #15 From Ferris McCormick 2007-03-07 09:08:44 0000 -------
Personal opinion, easily overidden.

1.  The bug is devrel's;
2.  We are not banning anyone from the mailing lists.  You who want to ban
ciaranm have been less civil than he has.

3.  I don't know where the "retire seemant" comes from.  If it's not from him,
over my dead body.

Regards,
Ferris

------- Comment #16 From Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2007-03-07 09:20:41 0000 -------
Removing the '/ retire seemant' from the summary again. Too many people got a
false impression from it. Seemant, please take your retirement request
somewhere else, this bug is about one specific thing, namely banning ciaran
from gentoo mailing lists. If you really feel the need to make it evident that
you will retire if any banning occurs, file a new bug and mark it as dependency
of this bug, though I personally view this as some sort of an attempt to
blackmail devrel.

------- Comment #17 From Bryan Østergaard (RETIRED) 2007-03-18 23:55:36 0000 -------
The Gentoo Council have instated a new Code of Conduct that covers bad
behaviour on mailing lists and other forms of communication. The proctors group
is being set up and will deal with flames on mailing lists in the future.

As such Developer Relations is closing this bug and letting the proctors group
handle any such issues in the future as decided by the Council.

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug