Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 168287 - dev-java/tomcat-native-1.1.8 stabilization request
Summary: dev-java/tomcat-native-1.1.8 stabilization request
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Java team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 171042
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2007-02-25 04:12 UTC by William L. Thomson Jr. (RETIRED)
Modified: 2007-05-15 19:08 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description William L. Thomson Jr. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-02-25 04:12:07 UTC
Stabilization request for Tomcat's native ssl accelerator. To test likely need to just emerge tomcat, and start it. Either 5.5, or 6.0.x. It should look for and load the native library by default. Sometimes requires path to be specified to Tomcat. Check tomcat log file for confirmation of loading or not, it will be at very top of catalina*.log file.
Comment 1 William L. Thomson Jr. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-02-25 04:18:30 UTC
By the way this will need apr 1.2.x to be stabilized first. Not sure exactly where that package is at, or it's deps. I just looked into it a bit and seems like apr and apr-util can be stabilized. 
Comment 2 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-02-25 11:57:18 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> By the way this will need apr 1.2.x to be stabilized first. Not sure exactly
> where that package is at, or it's deps. I just looked into it a bit and seems
> like apr and apr-util can be stabilized. 

 Apache team, are you ok with apr going stable?
Comment 3 Christian Heim (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-02-25 12:44:59 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > By the way this will need apr 1.2.x to be stabilized first. Not sure exactly
> > where that package is at, or it's deps. I just looked into it a bit and seems
> > like apr and apr-util can be stabilized. 
> 
>  Apache team, are you ok with apr going stable?

I think they are fine, but you'll have to ask for Bryan's/Luca's opinion. I haven't seen any breakage with it yet (neither subversion nor apache), but we still need to keep the old apr around, since the older (that's pre 2.2) still depends on it.

Comment 4 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-02-26 07:11:29 UTC
x86 stable
Comment 5 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-04-12 20:09:15 UTC
amd64 stable and closing
Comment 6 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-05-12 14:02:01 UTC
Can anyone tell me why dev-libs/apr-1.2.8 went stable, but the corresponding dev-libs/apr-util version didn't!?
Comment 7 Christian Heim (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-05-13 11:24:59 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> Can anyone tell me why dev-libs/apr-1.2.8 went stable, but the corresponding
> dev-libs/apr-util version didn't!?

Looks like opfer forgot about that.
Comment 8 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-05-15 19:08:20 UTC
Closing this bug again in favor of bug 178264.