Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 168287
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Java team <java@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: William L. Thomson Jr. (RETIRED) <wltjr@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 168287 depends on: 171042 Show dependency tree
Bug 168287 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2007-02-25 04:12 0000
Stabilization request for Tomcat's native ssl accelerator. To test likely need
to just emerge tomcat, and start it. Either 5.5, or 6.0.x. It should look for
and load the native library by default. Sometimes requires path to be specified
to Tomcat. Check tomcat log file for confirmation of loading or not, it will be
at very top of catalina*.log file.

------- Comment #1 From William L. Thomson Jr. (RETIRED) 2007-02-25 04:18:30 0000 -------
By the way this will need apr 1.2.x to be stabilized first. Not sure exactly
where that package is at, or it's deps. I just looked into it a bit and seems
like apr and apr-util can be stabilized. 

------- Comment #2 From Christian Faulhammer 2007-02-25 11:57:18 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> By the way this will need apr 1.2.x to be stabilized first. Not sure exactly
> where that package is at, or it's deps. I just looked into it a bit and seems
> like apr and apr-util can be stabilized. 

 Apache team, are you ok with apr going stable?

------- Comment #3 From Christian Heim (RETIRED) 2007-02-25 12:44:59 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > By the way this will need apr 1.2.x to be stabilized first. Not sure exactly
> > where that package is at, or it's deps. I just looked into it a bit and seems
> > like apr and apr-util can be stabilized. 
> 
>  Apache team, are you ok with apr going stable?

I think they are fine, but you'll have to ask for Bryan's/Luca's opinion. I
haven't seen any breakage with it yet (neither subversion nor apache), but we
still need to keep the old apr around, since the older (that's pre 2.2) still
depends on it.

------- Comment #4 From Christian Faulhammer 2007-02-26 07:11:29 0000 -------
x86 stable

------- Comment #5 From Christian Faulhammer 2007-04-12 20:09:15 0000 -------
amd64 stable and closing

------- Comment #6 From Carsten Lohrke 2007-05-12 14:02:01 0000 -------
Can anyone tell me why dev-libs/apr-1.2.8 went stable, but the corresponding
dev-libs/apr-util version didn't!?

------- Comment #7 From Christian Heim (RETIRED) 2007-05-13 11:24:59 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> Can anyone tell me why dev-libs/apr-1.2.8 went stable, but the corresponding
> dev-libs/apr-util version didn't!?

Looks like opfer forgot about that.

------- Comment #8 From Carsten Lohrke 2007-05-15 19:08:20 0000 -------
Closing this bug again in favor of bug 178264.

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug