Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 165283
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: The Soldering-Iron Brotherhood <sci-electronics@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Denis Dupeyron <calchan@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 165283 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 165283 blocks: 165948
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2007-02-04 14:29 0000 
Please arches, stabilize sci-electronics/gnucap-0.35.

I have written a short recipe explaining how arch testers can verify that
gnucap works properly on their machine. You'll find it here :
http://dev.gentoo.org/~calchan/sci-electronics/tests/index.xml#doc_chap2

Thanks in advance.
Denis.

------- Comment #1 From nixnut 2007-02-04 15:46:23 0000 ------- 
Stable on ppc

------- Comment #2 From Andrej Kacian (RETIRED) 2007-02-04 19:33:34 0000 ------- 
ticho@hiker ~/wrk/gnucap-0.35/examples $ ./runall gnucap >output
ticho@hiker ~/wrk/gnucap-0.35/examples $ diff -u output gnucap-0.35-output 
ticho@hiker ~/wrk/gnucap-0.35/examples $ echo $?
0


x86 done

------- Comment #3 From Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2007-02-05 15:04:57 0000 ------- 
sparc stable.
also nuked keywords from the snapshots otherwise users will never get the
final/upgrade.

------- Comment #4 From Denis Dupeyron 2007-02-06 20:33:20 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #2)
> ticho@hiker ~/wrk/gnucap-0.35/examples $ ./runall gnucap >output
> ticho@hiker ~/wrk/gnucap-0.35/examples $ diff -u output gnucap-0.35-output 
> ticho@hiker ~/wrk/gnucap-0.35/examples $ echo $?
> 0
> 
> 
> x86 done

Ticho, didn't you forget to keyword the ebuild ?

Denis.

------- Comment #5 From Christian Faulhammer 2007-02-08 13:29:43 0000 ------- 
x86 stable and nuked x86 keywords on other versions.

------- Comment #6 From Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2007-02-27 15:12:06 0000 ------- 
amd64 stable
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug