Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 163398
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) <hansmi@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Daniel Black <dragonheart@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
djbdns-1.05-r20.ebuild.patch djbdns-1.05-r20.ebuild.patch patch Daniel Black 2007-01-23 06:09 0000 598 bytes Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 163398 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 163398 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2007-01-23 06:09 0000 
when USE=ipv6 the cd to "${S}-noipv6" means that user DJBDNS_PATCH_DIR are
never applied (unless they are to dnstrace patches).

Also use=fwdonly was dropped so I assume the patch isn't needed.

------- Comment #1 From Daniel Black 2007-01-23 06:09:52 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=107870) [details]
djbdns-1.05-r20.ebuild.patch

------- Comment #2 From Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) 2007-01-23 18:00:04 0000 ------- 
Fixed in CVS, thanks.

------- Comment #3 From Daniel Black 2007-01-23 20:06:21 0000 ------- 
nice improvement to account for both - thanks

------- Comment #4 From Daniel Black 2007-01-24 21:20:40 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #3)
> nice improvement to account for both - thanks
> 
Nice improvement until you try to use it (sorry I should of tested it first). I
found the ipv6 patch hacks about every definition of a function, and lots of
argument passing. The downside is its pretty impossible to generate a patch
that works on the ipv6 source and the unpatched ipv4 source.

Recommend not patching the ${S}-noipv6 with the same patches as ${S} as it
causes more problems that the one (dnstrace patching) that it solves.

------- Comment #5 From Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) 2007-01-28 22:00:37 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #4)
> Nice improvement until you try to use it (sorry I should of tested it first). 

Yes, so should I have. :-) Fixed now as you suggested.
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug