Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 163220 - sys-apps/ed: insecure creation of temporary file (CVE-2006-6939)
Summary: sys-apps/ed: insecure creation of temporary file (CVE-2006-6939)
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 66400
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Security
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Vulnerabilities (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Security
URL: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename....
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-01-22 11:27 UTC by Raphael Marichez (Falco) (RETIRED)
Modified: 2007-02-11 10:35 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Raphael Marichez (Falco) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-22 11:27:15 UTC
Hi,

ed allows a local user to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack.

Fixed in ed-0.3

base-system team, please advise.
Comment 1 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2007-01-22 18:03:19 UTC
ed-0.4 now in portage
Comment 2 Matthias Geerdsen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-22 20:04:24 UTC
thanks vapier....

arches please test sys-apps/ed-0.4 and mark stable if possible
Comment 3 Ulrich Müller gentoo-dev 2007-01-22 20:25:48 UTC
Please note that the open_sbuf() security issue mentioned in the CVE was fixed in the Gentoo version of ed more than 2 years ago, see bug #66400, bug #73858, and GLSA 200410-07.

sys-apps/ed-0.2-r6 is definitely _not_ affected by the issue.
Comment 4 Matthias Geerdsen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-22 20:34:16 UTC
good catch, that indeed appears to be the case

vapier, could you confirm?
Comment 5 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2007-01-23 00:56:47 UTC
that does seem to be the case
Comment 6 Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-23 13:17:18 UTC
sparc stable.
Comment 7 Raphael Marichez (Falco) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-23 13:53:22 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 66400 ***
Comment 8 Raphael Marichez (Falco) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-23 13:56:33 UTC
arches, no need to mark this as stable now, Ulrich is right (comment #3). Thanks to him. Those who have already marked stable, you are free to decide what you prefer to do.
Comment 9 Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-23 13:58:56 UTC
We'll just leave it stable and roll back if there's any problem with the newer version.
Comment 10 René Nussbaumer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-23 20:50:27 UTC
stable on hppa