Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 162846
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Tiziano Müller <dev-zero@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Lorenzo Villani <arbiter@arbiterlab.net>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
poco-1.2.8.ebuild poco-1.2.8.ebuild text/plain Lorenzo Villani 2007-01-19 20:31 0000 525 bytes Details
poco-1.2.8.ebuild poco-1.2.8 2nd revision text/plain Lorenzo Villani 2007-01-21 01:20 0000 657 bytes Details
poco-1.2.8.ebuild poco-1.2.8.ebuild text/plain Lorenzo Villani 2007-01-21 01:34 0000 601 bytes Details
poco-1.2.8.ebuild poco-1.2.8.ebuild text/plain Lorenzo Villani 2007-01-21 01:36 0000 602 bytes Details
poco-1.2.8.ebuild poco-1.2.8.ebuild text/plain Lorenzo Villani 2007-01-30 18:29 0000 736 bytes Details
poco-1.3.2.ebuild Poco 1.3.2 ebuild text/plain Keith R. 2008-02-18 14:28 0000 1.89 KB Details
poco-1.3.2.ebuild Poco 1.3.2 updated ebuild text/plain Keith R. 2008-02-19 17:01 0000 1.41 KB Details
poco-1.3.2.ebuild Poco 1.3.2 3rd revision ebuild text/plain Keith R. 2008-02-20 14:40 0000 1.14 KB Details
poco-1.3.2.ebuild Poco 1.3.2 3rd revision ebuild text/plain Keith R. 2008-02-20 14:45 0000 1.15 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 162846 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 162846 blocks:
Votes: 1    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2007-01-19 20:30 0000
There is a quite useful collection of C++ Class library called POCO (POrtable
COmponents) which i would like to see in portage ;-).

Attached with this bug there is a simple, initial ebuild for it.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:

------- Comment #1 From Lorenzo Villani 2007-01-19 20:31:24 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=107480) [details]
poco-1.2.8.ebuild

------- Comment #2 From Lorenzo Villani 2007-01-21 01:20:18 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=107613) [details]
poco-1.2.8 2nd revision

------- Comment #3 From Lorenzo Villani 2007-01-21 01:34:59 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=107615) [details]
poco-1.2.8.ebuild

------- Comment #4 From Lorenzo Villani 2007-01-21 01:36:00 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=107616) [details]
poco-1.2.8.ebuild

------- Comment #5 From Lorenzo Villani 2007-01-30 18:29:34 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=108643) [details]
poco-1.2.8.ebuild

------- Comment #6 From Emil Wojak 2008-01-17 14:58:59 0000 -------
The ebuild works with poco-1.3.1 as well.
Hope it gets into Portage.

------- Comment #7 From Lorenzo Villani 2008-01-17 17:19:44 0000 -------
It seems that gentoo developers are too lazy or too busy fighting themselves
instead of working properly on their distribution or care about user's bug
reports and ebuild request. In one year no one at gentoo was able to review
this short ebuild. I left Gentoo a long time ago and I don't want to care about
it anymore. Sorry guys, I'm closing this bug by myself. This is once and for
all a farewell.

------- Comment #8 From Emil Wojak 2008-01-18 10:49:16 0000 -------
Hey!
I appreciate you having written the ebuild, but now you've really screwed up.
You could have just left the bug open if you weren't interested in it being
fixed nor were you eager to help any more. Note, that you are not the only one
interested in PoCo getting into Portage. How do I reopen it now?
Please keep in mind, that there just may not be enough maintainters out there,
or there really ARE more important things to do.
As you may have probably noticed, the bug is assigned to "Default Assignee for
New Packages <maintainer-wanted@gentoo.org>", which speaks for itself. Anyway,
I'm planning on becoming a maintainer in the nearest future myself, as I can
see there are more and more missing or lonely ebuilds out there.
I would be thankful if you could please reopen the bug. I hope you, as the
reporter, have that possibility, because I'm missing it somehow.

------- Comment #9 From Lorenzo Villani 2008-01-18 12:54:31 0000 -------
Reopened on request

------- Comment #10 From Keith R. 2008-02-18 14:28:05 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=143878) [details]
Poco 1.3.2 ebuild

The other ebuild lacked alot of options. It default to without odbc and ssl.
This one allows for odbc/ssl or ssl or without either. And it compiles now.

------- Comment #11 From Keith R. 2008-02-19 17:01:17 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=143989) [details]
Poco 1.3.2 updated ebuild

Fixed the ebuild due to some feedback. If you find any bugs. Let me know and
ill fix em.

------- Comment #12 From Keith R. 2008-02-20 14:40:40 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=144102) [details]
Poco 1.3.2 3rd revision ebuild

Fixed the missing " bug, removed it.
Removed the sed because it wasn't needed. And only made it not compile.

------- Comment #13 From Keith R. 2008-02-20 14:45:46 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=144104) [details]
Poco 1.3.2 3rd revision ebuild

Forgot to add the ~amd64 arch flag

------- Comment #14 From Tiziano Müller 2008-06-29 01:24:48 0000 -------
Added as dev-libs/poco.
Cheers,
Tiziano

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug