Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 16243
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: INVALID
Assigned To: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Dave Andruczyk <djandruczyk@yahoo.com>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 16243 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 16243 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2003-02-23 15:46 0000
running emerge rsync on my systems recently warns me that a new versionf of 
portage is available.  Checking via emerge world -up" says that portage version 
2.0.47-r2 is installed, but 2.0.46-r12 is scheduled to be installed if I run "emerge world 
-u"  I've tried multiple rsync's to make sure I didn't sync from an out-of date mirror. Still 
get the issue.  decided NOT to re-emerge an older version of portage for fear that it 
might cause more issues.   
 
does portageand your rsync system use some sort of check-pointing to determine how 
far out ofa data a mirror is with the central repository (like cvs) ? Waht happens when 
someone rsync's to a mirro that is behind the times? (slow links or server misconfig) 
 

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.emerge rsync 
2.emerge world -up 
 
Actual Results:  
"emerge" displays: 
 [ebuild    UD] sys-apps/portage-2.0.46-r12 [2.0.47-r2]    
 
2.0.47-r2 is already installed, why would I want to downgrade? 
 

Expected Results:  
not have chosen to downgrade portage to an older release. 
 

Portage 2.0.47-r2 (default-1.0, gcc-2.95.3, glibc-2.2.5-r2,2.2.5-r7) 
================================================================= 
System uname: 2.4.19-xfs-r2a i686 AMD Athlon(tm) MP 
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.oregonstate.edu/ http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Lin 
ux/distributions/gentoo" 
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /var/qmail/control /usr/share/config /usr/kde/2/share/confi 
g /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb:/usr/kde/3.1/share/config:/usr/ 
kde/3/share/config:/usr/share/config" 
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/env.d" 
PORTDIR="/usr/portage" 
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" 
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" 
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" 
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="" 
USE="x86 oss 3dnow apm avi crypt cups encode jpeg libg++ mikmod mmx mpeg 
ncurses 
 pdflib qtmt quicktime spell xml2 xmms xv aalib arts berkdb bonobo cdr directfb  
esd gdbm ggi gif gnome-libs gpm gtkhtml guile imlib java libwww motif mozilla na 
s nls oggvorbis pam perl png python qt readline ruby scanner sdl slang ssl svga  
tcltk tcpd tetex tiff X gtk gnome alsa kde opengl -ldap truetype" 
COMPILER="" 
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu" 
CFLAGS="-O2 -mcpu=i686 -pipe" 
CXXFLAGS="" 
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86" 
MAKEOPTS="-j3" 
AUTOCLEAN="yes" 
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage" 
FEATURES="sandbox ccache"

------- Comment #1 From Martin Holzer (RETIRED) 2003-02-23 15:57:01 0000 -------
there were too much problem with .47
so we decided to switch back

if you don't have any problems, you don't need to downgrade

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug