First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 16243
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: INVALID
Assigned To: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Dave Andruczyk <djandruczyk@yahoo.com>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 16243 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 16243 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2003-02-23 15:46 0000
running emerge rsync on my systems recently warns me that a new versionf of 
portage is available.  Checking via emerge world -up" says that portage version 
2.0.47-r2 is installed, but 2.0.46-r12 is scheduled to be installed if I run "emerge world 
-u"  I've tried multiple rsync's to make sure I didn't sync from an out-of date mirror. Still 
get the issue.  decided NOT to re-emerge an older version of portage for fear that it 
might cause more issues.   
 
does portageand your rsync system use some sort of check-pointing to determine how 
far out ofa data a mirror is with the central repository (like cvs) ? Waht happens when 
someone rsync's to a mirro that is behind the times? (slow links or server misconfig) 
 

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.emerge rsync 
2.emerge world -up 
 
Actual Results:  
"emerge" displays: 
 [ebuild    UD] sys-apps/portage-2.0.46-r12 [2.0.47-r2]    
 
2.0.47-r2 is already installed, why would I want to downgrade? 
 

Expected Results:  
not have chosen to downgrade portage to an older release. 
 

Portage 2.0.47-r2 (default-1.0, gcc-2.95.3, glibc-2.2.5-r2,2.2.5-r7) 
================================================================= 
System uname: 2.4.19-xfs-r2a i686 AMD Athlon(tm) MP 
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.oregonstate.edu/ http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Lin 
ux/distributions/gentoo" 
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /var/qmail/control /usr/share/config /usr/kde/2/share/confi 
g /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb:/usr/kde/3.1/share/config:/usr/ 
kde/3/share/config:/usr/share/config" 
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/env.d" 
PORTDIR="/usr/portage" 
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" 
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" 
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" 
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="" 
USE="x86 oss 3dnow apm avi crypt cups encode jpeg libg++ mikmod mmx mpeg 
ncurses 
 pdflib qtmt quicktime spell xml2 xmms xv aalib arts berkdb bonobo cdr directfb  
esd gdbm ggi gif gnome-libs gpm gtkhtml guile imlib java libwww motif mozilla na 
s nls oggvorbis pam perl png python qt readline ruby scanner sdl slang ssl svga  
tcltk tcpd tetex tiff X gtk gnome alsa kde opengl -ldap truetype" 
COMPILER="" 
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu" 
CFLAGS="-O2 -mcpu=i686 -pipe" 
CXXFLAGS="" 
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86" 
MAKEOPTS="-j3" 
AUTOCLEAN="yes" 
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage" 
FEATURES="sandbox ccache"

------- Comment #1 From Martin Holzer (RETIRED) 2003-02-23 15:57:01 0000 -------
there were too much problem with .47
so we decided to switch back

if you don't have any problems, you don't need to downgrade

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug