First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 160567
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: BIND Maintainers <bind@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Daniel Klaffenbach <direx@betriebsdirektor.de>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
bind-9.4.1-sdb-ldap.patch bind 9.4.1 sdb ldap patch patch Gabi Shaar 2008-03-07 15:31 0000 18.43 KB Details | Diff
bind-9.4.1_p1-r1.ebuild 9.4.1 ebuild with sdb-ldap use flag text/plain Gabi Shaar 2008-03-07 15:32 0000 8.27 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 160567 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 160567 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2007-01-06 20:30 0000 
it would be really cool if you could add support for ldap (bind-sdb) in the
bind ebuild. actually bind-sdb is already included in bind9, but you have to
add some things to the makefile to get it to work (as you can see in the readme
of bind-sdb). i've tried to use the ldap use-flag for bind, but this does not
enable bind-sdb. maybe you could add a use-flag like "bind-sdb" in a future
release of bind, to enable support for a ldap-database.
people who use gentoo on their servers (like me;) would probably love this.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. download bind from isc.org
2. unpack
3. check files in contrib/sdb/ldap

------- Comment #1 From mRyOuNg 2007-02-10 11:14:15 0000 ------- 
same for me with 9.3.4 and hardened profile ...

falling back to previous version (which was 9.3.2-r4) did the trick ...

------- Comment #2 From Konstantin Arkhipov 2007-02-22 11:18:51 0000 ------- 
btw, you can use dlz's ldap support atm.

------- Comment #3 From Daniel Klaffenbach 2007-09-05 16:48:24 0000 ------- 
OK, I know it took a while but I've finally tried dlz. What I can say about
dlz/LDAP right now is that it is a pain in the butt to get it to work with ldap
- I gave up after many sleepless nights :(...
Bind-sdb is much easier to set up and also easier to administrate/modify. Since
it does _not_ require any additional files (they come with every release of
bind) it should not be too hard to add sdb-support...

------- Comment #4 From Gabi Shaar 2008-03-07 15:31:34 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=145490) [edit]
bind 9.4.1 sdb ldap patch

------- Comment #5 From Gabi Shaar 2008-03-07 15:32:12 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=145491) [edit]
9.4.1 ebuild with sdb-ldap use flag

------- Comment #6 From Gabi Shaar 2008-03-07 15:33:01 0000 ------- 
a quick patch
only briefly tested.
please test.

------- Comment #7 From Gabi Shaar 2008-03-07 15:34:45 0000 ------- 
uses release 1.0 of sdb-ldap from http://bind9-ldap.bayour.com/

------- Comment #8 From Tobias Scherbaum 2008-07-20 10:28:10 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #7)
> uses release 1.0 of sdb-ldap from http://bind9-ldap.bayour.com/
> 

sdb-ldap support using the 1.1.0 patch added in 9.5.0_p1-r1.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug