Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 160002
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Java team <java@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Diego E. 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <flameeyes@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 160002 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 160002 blocks: 148821
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2007-01-04 09:36 0000
The following ebuilds are found to have broken autotools handling, as they run
libtoolize directly (they never should, instead they should call eautoreconf in
autotools.eclass, read http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/autofailure.xml for
more information):

./dev-java/glib-java/glib-java-0.2.3-r1.ebuild: libtoolize --force --copy ||
die "libtoolize failed"

Please cleanup the ebuilds by asking for stable marking, removing obsolete
ebuilds with no relevant keywords, or porting the fixes in newer versions (if
presents) to properly handle autotools.

Thanks,
Diego

------- Comment #1 From Vlastimil Babka (Caster) 2007-01-04 12:45:49 0000 -------
Let's get glib-java-0.2.6-r1 stable then... it's not exactly 30 days
old but revbump from -r0 didn't change ebuild, just ensured everyone will get a
minor change to java-gnome.eclass applied.

Last arch please note you are the last so we can punt the old ebuilds.

------- Comment #2 From Vlastimil Babka (Caster) 2007-01-04 13:11:08 0000 -------
On second thought, I will rather leave this to Betelgeuse to decide, as I don't
understand java-gnome that much and I am not sure whether all 6 parts of it
need to go stable together. Sorry for the spam.

------- Comment #3 From Petteri Räty 2007-01-25 22:20:57 0000 -------
Ok requesting stable:
Package                       Version             
============================= =================== 
dev-java/libvte-java          0.12.1-r1           
dev-java/libgconf-java        2.12.4-r1      
dev-java/libglade-java        2.12.6-r1      
dev-java/libgnome-java        2.12.5-r1        
dev-java/libgtk-java          2.8.7-r1         
dev-java/cairo-java           1.0.5-r1       
dev-java/glib-java            0.2.6-r1       
dev-java/java-gnome           2.14.3        

http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/java/wiki/TestingJavaPackages

Nothing uses the libraries atm so the only thing we can do is to test that they
emerge ok, of course if you want to write some test code yourself...

------- Comment #4 From Matthias Langer 2007-01-26 16:25:49 0000 -------
on x86:

i was able to install

dev-java/libvte-java-0.12.1-r1  USE="-doc -gcj -source" 
dev-java/libgconf-java-2.12.4-r1  USE="-doc -gcj -source" 
dev-java/libglade-java-2.12.6-r1  USE="gnome -doc -gcj -source" 
dev-java/libgnome-java-2.12.5-r1  USE="-doc -gcj -source"
dev-java/libgtk-java-2.8.7-r1  USE="-doc -gcj -source" 
dev-java/cairo-java-1.0.5-r1  USE="-doc -gcj -source" 
dev-java/glib-java-0.2.6-r1  USE="-doc -gcj -source" 
dev-java/java-gnome-2.14.3

with collision-protect and test using

dev-java/sun-jdk-1.4.2.13  USE="X alsa -doc -examples -jce -nsplugin"
dev-java/sun-jdk-1.5.0.10  USE="X alsa doc nsplugin -examples -jce"

if i've time i'm gonna try to remerge at least some of these with "doc" to
check the second point from
http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/java/wiki/TestingJavaPackages.

------- Comment #5 From Markus Meier 2007-01-28 22:41:26 0000 -------
on x86 the following packages emerge and pass collision test:
dev-java/libvte-java-0.12.1-r1 USE="doc source -gcj"
dev-java/libgconf-java-2.12.4-r1 USE="doc source -gcj"
dev-java/libglade-java-2.12.6-r1 USE="doc gnome source -gcj"
dev-java/libgnome-java-2.12.5-r1 USE="doc source -gcj"
dev-java/libgtk-java-2.8.7-r1 USE="doc source -gcj"
dev-java/cairo-java-1.0.5-r1 USE="doc source -gcj"
dev-java/glib-java-0.2.6-r1 USE="doc source -gcj"
dev-java/java-gnome-2.14.3

I emerged all with Blackdown JDK 1.4.2.03 and Sun JDK 1.5.0.10, but I didn't
try to emerge things with gcj as I don't have compiled gcc with it.
The docs should all be in the right place.

Portage 2.1.1-r2 (default-linux/x86/2006.1/desktop, gcc-4.1.1, glibc-2.4-r4,
2.6.18.6 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.18.6 i686 AMD Athlon(TM) XP1800+
Gentoo Base System version 1.12.6
Last Sync: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:00:01 +0000
ccache version 2.4 [enabled]
app-admin/eselect-compiler: [Not Present]
dev-java/java-config: 1.3.7, 2.0.31
dev-lang/python:     2.3.5-r3, 2.4.3-r4
dev-python/pycrypto: 2.0.1-r5
dev-util/ccache:     2.4-r6
dev-util/confcache:  [Not Present]
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.17
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.61
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r2, 1.10
sys-devel/binutils:  2.16.1-r3
sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.3.14
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.22
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.17-r2
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/3.5/env /usr/kde/3.5/share/config
/usr/kde/3.5/shutdown /usr/share/X11/xkb /usr/share/config"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/env.d /etc/env.d/java/ /etc/gconf
/etc/java-config/vms/ /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/terminfo /etc/texmf/web2c"
CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--nospinner"
FEATURES="autoconfig ccache collision-protect distlocks fixpackages
metadata-transfer parallel-fetch sandbox sfperms strict test userfetch userpriv
usersandbox"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://mirror.switch.ch/mirror/gentoo/ http://gentoo.inode.at/"
LANG="en_GB.utf8"
LINGUAS="en de en_GB"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times --compress
--force --whole-file --delete --delete-after --stats --timeout=180
--exclude='/distfiles' --exclude='/local' --exclude='/packages'"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage/normal"
SYNC="rsync://192.168.2.1/gentoo-portage"
USE="x86 3dnow 3dnowext X a52 aac alsa apache2 berkdb bitmap-fonts bzip2 cairo
cdr cli cracklib crypt cups dbus divx4linux dlloader dri dts dvd dvdr dvdread
eds elibc_glibc emboss exif fam ffmpeg firefox fortran gdbm gif gnome gphoto2
gpm gstreamer gtk hal iconv input_devices_keyboard input_devices_mouse ipv6
isdnlog java jpeg kde kernel_linux ldap libg++ linguas_de linguas_en
linguas_en_GB mad mikmod mmx mmxext mono mp3 mpeg ncurses network nls nptl
nptlonly ogg opengl oss pam pcre perl png ppds pppd python qt qt3 qt4 quicktime
readline reflection samba sdl seamonkey session spell spl ssl svg tcpd test
tetex tiff truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts udev unicode usb userland_GNU
vcd video_cards_none video_cards_nv vorbis win32codecs xine xinerama xml xorg
xprint xv xvid zlib"
Unset:  CTARGET, INSTALL_MASK, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS, MAKEOPTS,
PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS

------- Comment #6 From Christian Faulhammer 2007-01-29 09:32:46 0000 -------
x86 stable

------- Comment #7 From nixnut 2007-02-10 18:15:48 0000 -------
Stable on ppc

------- Comment #8 From Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2007-02-28 15:02:35 0000 -------
all stable on amd64

------- Comment #9 From Vlastimil Babka (Caster) 2007-02-28 16:53:17 0000 -------
*** Bug 160003 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #10 From Vlastimil Babka (Caster) 2007-02-28 17:04:20 0000 -------
Not really fixed until the actual cleanup :)

------- Comment #11 From Andrew Cowie 2007-03-01 01:55:54 0000 -------
These libraries are unsupported by upstream. In particular the versions you are
talking about are hideously out of date. These packages should be removed. See
Bug #160003 Comment #5 (which isn't really a dup of this, but whatever)

AfC

------- Comment #12 From Petteri Räty 2007-03-01 09:58:33 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> These libraries are unsupported by upstream. In particular the versions you are
> talking about are hideously out of date. These packages should be removed. See
> Bug #160003 Comment #5 (which isn't really a dup of this, but whatever)
> 
> AfC
> 

Yeah we are in the process of removing them.

------- Comment #13 From Petteri Räty 2007-03-31 10:07:47 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #12)
> 
> Yeah we are in the process of removing them.
> 

Nothing in dev-java uses libtoolize directly any more:
betelgeuse@pena /usr/portage/dev-java $ grep libtoolize -r .
./rxtx/rxtx-2.1.7.2-r1.ebuild:  elibtoolize
./rxtx/rxtx-2.1.7.2.ebuild:     elibtoolize

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug