First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 158030
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Roy Marples (RETIRED) <uberlord@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
libgtop-2.14.4.patch trivial patch patch Roy Marples (RETIRED) 2006-12-13 06:58 0000 1.92 KB Details | Diff
libgtop-2.14.4-fbsd.patch FreeBSD only patch patch Roy Marples (RETIRED) 2006-12-13 06:59 0000 15.17 KB Details | Diff
libgtop-2.14.4-fbsd.patch FreeBSD patch patch Roy Marples (RETIRED) 2006-12-18 08:39 0000 14.73 KB Details | Diff
libgtop-2.14.4.patch trivial patch patch Roy Marples (RETIRED) 2006-12-18 08:54 0000 1.42 KB Details | Diff
libgtop-2.14.6-fbsd.patch FreeBSD patch patch Roy Marples (RETIRED) 2007-01-18 13:56 0000 14.60 KB Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 158030 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 158030 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2006-12-13 06:57 0000 
And it requires a trivial patch that would be affected by Linux systems and a
faily major patch that can only be applid to FreeBSD systems as it adds FreeBSD
libs to the Makefile. As such, two patches will follow - they are based on the
patches in FreeBSD ports (and one from steev) and they enable system-monitor to
run correctly.

------- Comment #1 From Roy Marples (RETIRED) 2006-12-13 06:58:19 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=103948) [edit]
trivial patch

------- Comment #2 From Roy Marples (RETIRED) 2006-12-13 06:59:07 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=103949) [edit]
FreeBSD only patch

Should only be applied with use kernel_FreeBSD

------- Comment #3 From Roy Marples (RETIRED) 2006-12-18 08:39:07 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=104287) [edit]
FreeBSD patch

New patch should work fine with other OS's too

------- Comment #4 From Roy Marples (RETIRED) 2006-12-18 08:54:39 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=104289) [edit]
trivial patch

Same as before, just with the configure patch removed as it's been included in
the new FreeBSD patch above

------- Comment #5 From Roy Marples (RETIRED) 2006-12-18 08:55:20 0000 ------- 
upstream bug
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387200

------- Comment #6 From Roy Marples (RETIRED) 2007-01-18 13:56:55 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=107376) [edit]
FreeBSD patch

Patch for 2.14.6

------- Comment #7 From Daniel Gryniewicz 2007-01-26 02:24:53 0000 ------- 
The upstream bug has a comment, that I happen to agree with.  It really appears
that result is declared, then checked without being set...

------- Comment #8 From Roy Marples (RETIRED) 2007-02-05 23:10:33 0000 ------- 
Upstream have merged my patch here.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=81514&action=view

Can we get this in portage pretty please :)

------- Comment #9 From Daniel Gryniewicz 2007-02-06 02:07:46 0000 ------- 
Done.

Can you test it to make sure I got my use check correct?  I'd prefer to not
have to run eautoreconf everywhere, since it adds ~1/4 again to the merge
time...

I did test the the patch and eautoreconf works correctly with the if statement
commented out.

------- Comment #10 From Roy Marples (RETIRED) 2007-02-06 10:26:41 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #9)
> Done.
> 
> Can you test it to make sure I got my use check correct?  I'd prefer to not
> have to run eautoreconf everywhere, since it adds ~1/4 again to the merge
> time...

WFM

Blessed with the ~x86-fbsd keyword :)
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug