Bugzilla Bug 158030

And it requires a trivial patch that would be affected by Linux systems and a
faily major patch that can only be applid to FreeBSD systems as it adds FreeBSD
libs to the Makefile. As such, two patches will follow - they are based on the
patches in FreeBSD ports (and one from steev) and they enable system-monitor to
run correctly.

Created an attachment (id=103948) [details]
trivial patch

Created an attachment (id=103949) [details]
FreeBSD only patch

Should only be applied with use kernel_FreeBSD

Created an attachment (id=104287) [details]
FreeBSD patch

New patch should work fine with other OS's too

Created an attachment (id=104289) [details]
trivial patch

Same as before, just with the configure patch removed as it's been included in
the new FreeBSD patch above

upstream bug
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387200

Created an attachment (id=107376) [details]
FreeBSD patch

Patch for 2.14.6

The upstream bug has a comment, that I happen to agree with.  It really appears
that result is declared, then checked without being set...

Upstream have merged my patch here.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=81514&action=view

Can we get this in portage pretty please :)

Done.

Can you test it to make sure I got my use check correct?  I'd prefer to not
have to run eautoreconf everywhere, since it adds ~1/4 again to the merge
time...

I did test the the patch and eautoreconf works correctly with the if statement
commented out.

(In reply to comment #9)
> Done.
> 
> Can you test it to make sure I got my use check correct?  I'd prefer to not
> have to run eautoreconf everywhere, since it adds ~1/4 again to the merge
> time...

WFM

Blessed with the ~x86-fbsd keyword :)