Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 15769
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Zach Welch (RETIRED) <zwelch@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: SpanKY <vapier@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 15769 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 15769 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2003-02-16 00:40 0000 
should use /var/run/ ;)

------- Comment #1 From Zach Welch (RETIRED) 2003-02-17 15:37:36 0000 ------- 
Fixed with distcc-1.1-r9. Thanks.

------- Comment #2 From Max Kalika (RETIRED) 2003-02-17 16:22:05 0000 ------- 
I'm confused.  This is something I mention in #15048.  How is the user "nobody"
supposed to be able to write the pid file in /var/run?  Unless the privileges
get dropped after the pid file is written?  Or the file is written after the
process is started as nobody and control is returned back to the init script? 
In either case, this also solves 15048 (which was the main reason to make
distccd run as distccd and not nobody).

------- Comment #3 From Zach Welch (RETIRED) 2003-02-17 18:15:22 0000 ------- 
erm.. Okay, so I broke things with -r9... I'm fixing things in -r10
and package.mask'ing distcc-1.1-r9 in the meantime

Sorry for the confusion.

------- Comment #4 From Zach Welch (RETIRED) 2003-02-17 18:49:03 0000 ------- 
Okay, try the latest -r10 that's out now.  and sorry for that last one. :/
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug