Bugzilla Bug 155842

Wednesday 01. of November 2006 Xvid 1.1.2 released

This release is Xvid 1.1.2 bugfix release. It fixes and replaces previous Xvid
1.1.1 release.
Changes since 1.1.1:
xvidcore library 

    * Fixed typo in xvid.c
    * Updated bitstream.h to fix the previous faulty non-aligned bitstream
buffers fix

Changes since 1.1.0:
xvidcore library 

    * Fixed bug when frame-drop (N-VOP) feature is used in combination with
packed B-frames
    * Fix for premature EOF in xvid_decraw example
    * Fixed potential crash on Intel EMT64 architecture 
    * Several fixes for IA64 platform (patch by Thomas Koeckerbauer)
    * Fix for visual_object_verid vs. video_object_layer_verid problem
    * Ensure intervening bytes are preserved in BitstreamInit()

VFW frontend

    * Prevent segfault when encoding application calls compress_end with NULL
codec context (PerfectDark at yandex dot ru)
    * Profile definitions updates

DShow frontend

    * Add missing debug.c

Created an attachment (id=103025) [edit]
xvid 1.1.2

Tested, encoded two HD WMV files to Xvid 1.1.2 via mencoder.  Encoded via the
following 

mencoder Coral_Reef_Adventure_1080.wmv -ovc xvid -oac mp3lame -xvidencopts
fixed_quant=4 -o test.avi

Playback was successful, no problems seen on EMT64 platform.

Let's get'er done,
Thank you,
Frank Russo

I tested it too. No problems on AMD XP 2000+ with mplayer 1.0-rc1 and xvid
1.1.2. 
I encoded and played back several files. 
Who put it in the portage tree?

why is the new version 1.1.2 not in the portage tree?

(In reply to comment #4)
> why is the new version 1.1.2 not in the portage tree?

Because the 1.1.0 patches still applies to 1.1.2.
I'm testing 1.1.2, I'll bump it when I'll be happy with it, that'll be probably
on the beginning of next week. (testing xvid encoding takes time ;) )

Please ping me if I forget to commit it ;)

In cvs, bumping earlier than expected since all my tests were succesfull ;)

(In reply to comment #6)
> In cvs, bumping earlier than expected since all my tests were succesfull ;)

that is amusing me because of this:
"Wednesday 01. of November 2006 Xvid 1.1.2 released"
it was released about 3 month ago!

(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > In cvs, bumping earlier than expected since all my tests were succesfull ;)
> 
> that is amusing me because of this:
> "Wednesday 01. of November 2006 Xvid 1.1.2 released"
> it was released about 3 month ago!
> 
Sadly! This would be amusing if the dev get paid for that work (and only for
that).
But we all have plenty of packages to look at.