Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 155243
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo's Team for Core System packages <base-system@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: José Alberto Suárez López <bass@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 155243 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 155243 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2006-11-15 06:24 0000
We provide the ipset user tools but not the ipset patch. I think can be nice to
include it in iptables extensions like imq and layer7.

------- Comment #1 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-11-16 00:21:38 0000 -------
Maybe you could attach the patch or post a link? :=)

------- Comment #2 From José Alberto Suárez López 2006-11-20 00:27:21 0000 -------
of course :)
http://ipset.netfilter.org/

the patch is applied with patchomatic-ng
http://ipset.netfilter.org/patch-o-matic-ng-20061009.tar.bz2

enjoy :)

------- Comment #3 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-01-02 04:57:35 0000 -------
Noone will ever notice again unless you reopen the bug.

------- Comment #4 From Caleb Cushing 2007-02-17 19:32:08 0000 -------
what's the status? yes, no, ever going to get done? 

------- Comment #5 From SpanKY 2007-02-17 20:56:44 0000 -------
i'm not a fan of including patches in iptables ... only reason the others are
there is because some developer needed/wanted them and so they added them

perhaps an easier thing would be to add generic support for the patch-o-matic
and users can add whatever they want

------- Comment #6 From Caleb Cushing 2007-02-18 00:22:33 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> i'm not a fan of including patches in iptables ... only reason the others are
> there is because some developer needed/wanted them and so they added them
> 
> perhaps an easier thing would be to add generic support for the patch-o-matic
> and users can add whatever they want
> 
I was thinking that myself actually. perhaps an ebuild for patch-o-matic, maybe
have the use flags there define what patches it would add... something better
than. download patch-o-matic extract manually... extract iptables source
manually. run script. and maybe make an ipset use flag in iptables that will
pull both the patch-o-matic and ipset ebuild as a dependency.

------- Comment #7 From SpanKY 2007-08-25 16:27:00 0000 -------
1.3.8-r2 allows for user patchsets

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug