Bugzilla Bug 154489

Dear arch teams, the big day has come. After a long, long waiting, we now ask
you to please consider stabilizing our beautiful baby, tetex-3.0_p1-r3. It's
already ~arch everywhere except on mips. As bug #124511 shows, there are no
more open issues (that we are aware of, at least).

It would also be nice if mips, ppc, ppc64, ppc-macos, sparc and x86 could
stabilize tetex-2.0.2-r9 at the same time, in order to avoid unnecessary
recompilations. Those two versions of tetex are the ones that we will likely
keep for some time.

Thanks in advance.

sparc stable for both.  We plan to hold you to the "Those two versions of tetex
are the ones that we will likely keep for some time"  comment. :)

tetex 2.0.2-r9 on ppc doesn't pass the tests

>>> Source compiled.
>>> Test phase [check]: app-text/tetex-2.0.2-r9
This is BibTeX, Version 0.99c (Web2C 7.4.5)
The top-level auxiliary file: tests/exampl.aux
I couldn't open database file xampl.bib
---line 1 of file tests/exampl.aux
 : \bibdata{xampl
 :               }
I'm skipping whatever remains of this command
The style file: apalike.bst
I found no database files---while reading file tests/exampl.aux
Warning--I didn't find a database entry for "whole-journal"
Warning--I didn't find a database entry for "whole-set"
Warning--I didn't find a database entry for "whole-collection"
Warning--I didn't find a database entry for "whole-proceedings"
Warning--I didn't find a database entry for "book-full"
(There were 2 error messages)
make[2]: *** [bibtex-check] Error 2
make[1]: *** [check] Error 1
make: *** [check] Error 2

!!! ERROR: app-text/tetex-2.0.2-r9 failed.
Call stack:
  ebuild.sh, line 1546:   Called dyn_test
  ebuild.sh, line 986:   Called src_test
  ebuild.sh, line 616:   Called die

!!! Make check failed. See above for details.
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if
relevant.

(In reply to comment #2)
> tetex 2.0.2-r9 on ppc doesn't pass the tests

Did you have a teTeX version installed before you did the emerge that failed?

Tests have always been a bit shaky when installing teTeX for the first time.

tetex-3.0_p1-r3 is stable on x86
2.0.2-r9 has a test issue (same as ppc) which is investigated by nattfodd, so
this will wait a bit

Readding sparc, you stabled the wrong version.

tetex-3.0_p1-r3 stable on ppc

@Opfer: on this issue, see http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115775#c39

We should probably disable this test entirely, Martin, what do you think?

(In reply to comment #6)
> We should probably disable this test entirely, Martin, what do you think?

I grew tired of fixing tests for tetex a long time ago :-)
They rarely mean anything, so disable broken tests is probably the way to go,
IMO.

(In reply to comment #4)
> tetex-3.0_p1-r3 is stable on x86
> 2.0.2-r9 has a test issue (same as ppc) which is investigated by nattfodd, so
> this will wait a bit
> 
> Readding sparc, you stabled the wrong version.
> 

So I did.  I was thinking the right version, but there was a disconnect.  I'm
fixing it now, if repoman ever decides to finish.

Now tetex-3.0_p1-r3 really is stable on sparc, like I thought I had done in the
first place.  Sorry for being unable to read or whatever my problem was.

app-text/tetex-3.0_p1-r3 stable for HPPA.

(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > We should probably disable this test entirely, Martin, what do you think?
> I grew tired of fixing tests for tetex a long time ago :-)
> They rarely mean anything, so disable broken tests is probably the way to go,
> IMO.

 Would you be so kind and do that, as Alexandre is not available at the moment.

tetex-3.0_p1-r3 emerges fine on amd64 and seems to be working.

Portage 2.1.1-r1 (default-linux/amd64/2006.1/desktop, gcc-4.1.1, glibc-2.4-r4,
2.6.18-suspend2-Dudebox-Edition x86_64)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.18-suspend2-Dudebox-Edition x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64
Processor 3200+
Gentoo Base System version 1.12.6
Last Sync: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 05:00:01 +0000
distcc 2.18.3 x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (protocols 1 and 2) (default port 3632)
[enabled]
ccache version 2.3 [enabled]
app-admin/eselect-compiler: [Not Present]
dev-java/java-config: 1.3.7, 2.0.30
dev-lang/python:     2.4.3-r4
dev-python/pycrypto: 2.0.1-r5
dev-util/ccache:     2.3
dev-util/confcache:  [Not Present]
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.17
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.60
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r2
sys-devel/binutils:  2.16.1-r3
sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.3.13-r4
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.22
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.11-r2
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-march=k8 -msse3 -Os -pipe"
CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/3.5/env /usr/kde/3.5/share/config
/usr/kde/3.5/shutdown /usr/share/X11/xkb /usr/share/config /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/env.d /etc/env.d/java/ /etc/gconf
/etc/java-config/vms/ /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/terminfo"
CXXFLAGS="-march=k8 -msse3 -Os -pipe"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoconfig ccache collision-protect distcc distlocks
metadata-transfer multilib-strict parallel-fetch sandbox sfperms strict test"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="ftp://linux.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/gentoo-mirror/
ftp:///ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/pub/Mirrors/gentoo/"
LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1"
MAKEOPTS="-j4"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times --compress
--force --whole-file --delete --delete-after --stats --timeout=180
--exclude='/distfiles' --exclude='/local' --exclude='/packages'"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage_overlay"
SYNC="rsync://server/gentoo-portage"
USE="amd64 X alsa apache2 berkdb bitmap-fonts cairo cdr cli cracklib crypt cups
dbus dlloader dri dvd dvdr eds elibc_glibc emboss encode esd fam firefox
fortran gcj gdbm gif gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 hal iconv imap
input_devices_keyboard input_devices_mouse isdnlog jpeg kde kdeenablefinal
kdehiddenvisibility kernel_linux libg++ mad mikmod mp3 mpeg mysql ncurses nls
nptl nptlonly objc objc++ ogg oss pam pcre perl png ppds pppd python qt3 qt4
quicktime readline reflection sdl session spell spl sqlite ssl tcpd test
truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts udev unicode userland_GNU
video_cards_radeon vorbis xml xorg xv zlib"
Unset:  CTARGET, EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS, INSTALL_MASK, LANG, LC_ALL, LINGUAS,
PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS

(In reply to comment #11)
>  Would you be so kind and do that, as Alexandre is not available at the moment.

I'll look into it this weekend.

Btw. do you know why is Alexandre unavailable at the moment?

(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> >  Would you be so kind and do that, as Alexandre is not available at the moment.
> 
> I'll look into it this weekend.
> Btw. do you know why is Alexandre unavailable at the moment?

 He told me he is in Sweden and can't do anything for Gentoo.

(In reply to comment #12)
> tetex-3.0_p1-r3 emerges fine on amd64 and seems to be working.

...and marked stable. Waiting for tetex-2 though

I'm sorry, I should have warned you, I'll just be mostly unavailable until next
wednesday (I've set my devaway accordingly).
Hopefully, all those issues can wait a bit.

</mylife>

(In reply to comment #15)
> ...and marked stable. Waiting for tetex-2 though

No need to, that was stabled on amd64 7 months ago ;)

ppc64 stable

Created an attachment (id=102269) [edit]
Patch to skip bibtex test

@Opfer: can you test this patch and tell me if tetex-2.0.2 passes all tests
with it?

(In reply to comment #19)
> Created an attachment (id=102269) [edit]
> Patch to skip bibtex test
> 
> @Opfer: can you test this patch and tell me if tetex-2.0.2 passes all tests
> with it?

 It passes everything, I only had to patch Makefile.in instead of Makefile.

(In reply to comment #19)
> Created an attachment (id=102269) [edit]
> Patch to skip bibtex test
> 
> @Opfer: can you test this patch and tell me if tetex-2.0.2 passes all tests
> with it?

 Will that patch ever be applied?  Does it matter?

I've added the patch to tetex-2.0.2-r9 (applying it to Makefile.in instead of
Makefile, thanks Christian).
Sorry for the delay.

(In reply to comment #22)
> I've added the patch to tetex-2.0.2-r9 (applying it to Makefile.in instead of
> Makefile, thanks Christian).
> Sorry for the delay.

 No problem...thank you.  Done on x86.

ppc, you revisit tetex-2.0.2-r9 please? :)

ppc done

alpha stable