Bugzilla Bug 154196

the e-9999 ebuild currently renames the executable to enlightenment-0.17 to
avoid conflicts with enlightenment 16 in case anyone wants both installed. It
also patches enlightenment_start to reflect this. However, doing this now
somehow breaks the restart function of enlightenment. Restarting E results in
it just exiting. I haven't dug in to find out exactly why yet, but commenting
out the enlightenment_start sed replacement and the rename fixes the problem.
Either further patching is required, or we need to just give up the idea of
having both versions of E installed.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 148564 ***

sorry, not a duplicate of that bug. You may notice that I mentioned that
solution in my report:

> It also patches enlightenment_start to reflect this.

and then I go on to report a problem different from the one in bug #148564:
WITH the sed to "fix" enlightenment_start, E is broken: you cannot restart E,
such as via
main menu -> Enlightenment -> Restart
or via
enlightenment_remote -restart

WITHOUT both the sed and the mv, restart works correctly.

Conclusion: the ebuild is breaking Enlightenment's restart function.

If you don't have E16 installed you can copy the e-9999.ebuild to your overlay
and remove the sed and mv operations and E17 will install as it is intended.

I'm not sure, but ln -s /usr/bin/enlightenment-0.17 /usr/bin/enlightenment
might also work.

(In reply to comment #3)
> If you don't have E16 installed you can copy the e-9999.ebuild to your overlay
> and remove the sed and mv operations and E17 will install as it is intended.

yes, that is how I tested that:
> WITHOUT both the sed and the mv, restart works correctly.

note that the presence of a workaround does not invalidate the bug.

Isn't it possible to move the compatibility rename bit to E16?

better idea, add a USE flag that disables the rename. Some people (like me) are
never going to install e16, but use e17 all day long. Give US the choice.
That's why im on gentoo to begin with.

(In reply to comment #6)
> better idea, add a USE flag that disables the rename. Some people (like me) are
> never going to install e16, but use e17 all day long. Give US the choice.
> That's why im on gentoo to begin with.
> 

You have the choice already, rip out the rename bits and bungle the ebuild in a
overlay.

you guys sure do whine a lot

overlay is fine now