First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 152297
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Maurice van der Pot <griffon26@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Ed Catmur <ed@catmur.co.uk>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 152297 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 152297 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2006-10-21 14:16 0000 
checking the glibc version... unsupported version
configure: error: Valgrind requires glibc version 2.2, 2.3 or 2.4

!!! Please attach the following file when filing a report to bugs.gentoo.org:
!!! /var/tmp/portage/dev-util/valgrind-3.2.1/work/valgrind-3.2.1/config.log

!!! ERROR: dev-util/valgrind-3.2.1 failed.
Call stack:
  ebuild.sh, line 1568:   Called dyn_compile
  ebuild.sh, line 937:   Called src_compile
  valgrind-3.2.1.ebuild, line 78:   Called econf '--with-x'
  ebuild.sh, line 540:   Called die

!!! econf failed
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if
relevant.

Yada yada. I'll try faking out glibc 2.5 as a 2.4.

------- Comment #1 From Ed Catmur 2006-10-21 14:22:45 0000 ------- 
Can't see it on upstream bz. I'll file there. Who maintains valgrind; is it a
Red Hat project?

------- Comment #2 From Ed Catmur 2006-10-21 14:28:43 0000 ------- 
Oh, 2.5 support is in svn. 

Hm - I think we want commits 6210 and 6239.

------- Comment #3 From Ed Catmur 2006-10-21 14:46:01 0000 ------- 
Well, it merges. Seems to work OK.

------- Comment #4 From Mario Liehr 2006-10-24 01:05:22 0000 ------- 
Where can I get these commits 6210 and 6239?

Or better: can you provide some patchfile and a fixed ebuild?

------- Comment #5 From Ed Catmur 2006-10-24 01:32:43 0000 ------- 
They're on the svn.  Sorry, don't have time to put the patch up now; it's in my
svn though if you want to look for it.

------- Comment #6 From Mario Liehr 2006-10-24 01:45:16 0000 ------- 
"my svn" was the hint! Now I found it and it is working.

------- Comment #7 From Maurice van der Pot 2006-10-24 09:08:38 0000 ------- 
I modified 3.2.1 to include these patches.

Thanks.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug