Bugzilla Bug 152141

*** colordiffrc.~1~     Fri Oct 20 10:51:53 2006
--- colordiffrc Fri Oct 20 10:48:53 2006
***************
*** 7,13 ****
  # to a file, it detects this and does not colour-highlight
  # To make the patch file *include* colours, change the option
  # below to 'yes'
! color_patches=no
  # 
  # available colours are: white, yellow, green, blue,
  #                        cyan, red, magenta, black,
--- 7,13 ----
  # to a file, it detects this and does not colour-highlight
  # To make the patch file *include* colours, change the option
  # below to 'yes'
! color_patch=no
  # 
  # available colours are: white, yellow, green, blue,
  #                        cyan, red, magenta, black,


*** colordiffrc-lightbg.~1~     Fri Sep 15 07:51:57 2006
--- colordiffrc-lightbg Fri Oct 20 10:48:06 2006
***************
*** 7,13 ****
  # to a file, it detects this and does not colour-highlight
  # To make the patch file *include* colours, change the option
  # below to 'yes'
! color_patches=no
  # 
  # available colours are: white, yellow, green, blue,
  #                        cyan, red, magenta, black,
--- 7,13 ----
  # to a file, it detects this and does not colour-highlight
  # To make the patch file *include* colours, change the option
  # below to 'yes'
! color_patch=no
  # 
  # available colours are: white, yellow, green, blue,
  #                        cyan, red, magenta, black,

fixed, thanks

http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-misc/colordiff/colordiff-1.0.6-r1.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup

I guess this was fixed by upstream (in the code - not the configs) in 1.0.6a.
Hence the sed in src_unpack() should be removed for that version. Otherwise you
get this error message:

"Invalid colour specification for setting color_patch (no) in /etc/colordiffrc"

Thanks.

Reopen for Comment #2.

Fixed in colordiff-1.0.6a-r1, thanks!