Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 151487
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Markus Dittrich <markusle@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Adam Piątyszek <ediap@users.sourceforge.net>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 151487 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 151487 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2006-10-15 12:03 0000
Hi Markus,

I have just published a new bug-fix release of IT++ (3.10.6). So, please bump
the itpp ebuild in Gentoo as well.

This is quite important bug-fix release, since one major linking problem was
solved. Previous IT++ releases have undefined non-weak symbols in the output
shared library. You can check this using "ldd -r /usr/lib/libitpp.so.2.2.0".
Besides, it includes a set of other internal fixes (no interface changes).

Therefore, I would recommend marking it stable for x86 as soon as possible. It
would be great, if recently added amd64 platform consider itpp stabilisation as
well. 

Thanks in advance!

BR,
/ediap

------- Comment #1 From Markus Dittrich 2006-10-16 05:57:41 0000 -------
Hi Adam,

Thanks for the note and I hope I can get to it tonight!
Let then stabilize this version on x86 and amd64 as
soon as the required 30 "bug-less" days are passed.
(stabling it earlier would require that there is a major
security issue or sth along these lines).

Thanks,
Markus

------- Comment #2 From Adam Piątyszek 2006-10-16 06:21:25 0000 -------
Hi Markus,

(In reply to comment #1)
> Thanks for the note and I hope I can get to it tonight!

Thanks for your prompt answer! It is the highest time to add your name to the
"hall of fame" list of IT++ contributors ;-)

> Let then stabilize this version on x86 and amd64 as
> soon as the required 30 "bug-less" days are passed.
> (stabling it earlier would require that there is a major
> security issue or sth along these lines).

Sure, this can certainly wait another month, since this linkin bug has not been
found by anyone for more than year! The Fedora Extras project devs identified
this problem when they prepared RPM packages last week.

After having this stable, we can remove the previous IT++ versions from the
portage tree.

BR,
/Adam

------- Comment #3 From Markus Dittrich 2006-10-16 17:37:22 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> 
> Thanks for your prompt answer! It is the highest time to add your name to the
> "hall of fame" list of IT++ contributors ;-)
> 

Hi Adam,

Thanks, and I have to thank you for always keeping me up to date :)
I've just bumped itpp in portage cvs and set the timer to x-30 days.

cheers,
Markus

------- Comment #4 From Adam Piątyszek 2006-11-16 07:00:36 0000 -------
Hi Markus,

(In reply to comment #3)
> Thanks, and I have to thank you for always keeping me up to date :)
> I've just bumped itpp in portage cvs and set the timer to x-30 days.

Just a reminder... The time is up! ;-)

BR,
/Adam

------- Comment #5 From Markus Dittrich 2006-11-16 14:45:46 0000 -------
Hi Adam,

Thanks for staying on top of things; I haven't forgotten about it - 
as a matter of fact my Korganizer daemon kindly reminded me this morning ;) 
I'll do it either tomorrow or this weekend. 

Best,
Markus

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug