First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 150945
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) <seemant@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: James Rowe <jnrowe@ukfsn.org>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
surfraw-2.1.5-version_bumpage.patch surfraw-2.1.5-version_bumpage.patch patch James Rowe 2006-10-11 21:33 0000 2.69 KB Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 150945 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 150945 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2006-10-11 21:32 0000 
A new release of surfraw is out, with a few new elvi and many bugfixes.
The two new elvi are for Google's scholar search, Gentoo's packages page and
discogs.  Inclueded in the bugfixes is a solution to the MacOS problem
reported a couple of years ago in Bug #58955!

  This one is finally going to be a candidate for prospective stabilistion,
it has slurped up patches for the little issues that have prevented me
calling for stabilisation testing in previous versions :)

Thanks,

James

------- Comment #1 From James Rowe 2006-10-11 21:33:43 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=99401) [edit]
surfraw-2.1.5-version_bumpage.patch

Seemant,

  Some rationale for the changes:

  * A new version of the Gentoo packages patch, because this release has
    conflict causing changes.  I've hardcoded the version number in to the
    epatch call because it should be usable in future bumps as-is.

  * It removes /etc/surfraw_elvi.list in pkg_postinst(), it was an
    autogenerated file and is no longer used.  Really, it shouldn't have
    been there in the first place.  In-tree precedent for exists for
    auto-removal, but if you're not happy with it I'll replace it.

Cheers

James

------- Comment #2 From Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) 2006-10-20 04:18:10 0000 ------- 
in portage, thanks James.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug