Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 149864 - x11-terms/mrxvt-0.5.2 (version bump)
Summary: x11-terms/mrxvt-0.5.2 (version bump)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Krzysztof Pawlik (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: EBUILD
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-10-02 09:46 UTC by Gautam Iyer
Modified: 2006-10-04 14:27 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Ebuild for mrxvt-0.5.2 (mrxvt-0.5.2.ebuild,3.54 KB, text/plain)
2006-10-02 09:48 UTC, Gautam Iyer
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Gautam Iyer 2006-10-02 09:46:54 UTC
Hi,

Here's an ebuild for the recently released mrxvt-0.5.2.

NOTE: It uses the xpm, png and jpeg use flags. If all of them are disabled, then mrxvt compiles without background support (making it a little lighter, but making the tabbar a little more ugly).

GI
Comment 1 Gautam Iyer 2006-10-02 09:48:22 UTC
Created attachment 98611 [details]
Ebuild for mrxvt-0.5.2
Comment 2 Krzysztof Pawlik (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-10-04 12:04:14 UTC
The ebuild in attachment #98611 [details] is a modified ebuild for very old version. For example: ebuild for 0.5.1 has already optional png and jpeg support. Simple bump to 0.5.2 works for me ok. For future: please attach diff against latest version in portage.
Comment 3 Gautam Iyer 2006-10-04 13:44:50 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> The ebuild in attachment #98611 [details] [edit] is a modified ebuild for very old version. For
> example: ebuild for 0.5.1 has already optional png and jpeg support. Simple
> bump to 0.5.2 works for me ok. For future: please attach diff against latest
> version in portage.

Just FYI -- The original "very old" ebuild was written and submitted by me a while ago. And I'd recommend *against* a simple version bump because whomever accepted my 0.5.1 ebuild kindly removed the xpm use flag.

If you read the comments in the 0.5.1/2 ebuilds you'll see that the xpm, png and jpeg use flags must *ALL* be disabled to remove background support. Disabling only two of them will not disable background support.

GI
Comment 4 Krzysztof Pawlik (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-10-04 13:56:20 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Just FYI -- The original "very old" ebuild was written and submitted by me a
> while ago. And I'd recommend *against* a simple version bump because whomever
> accepted my 0.5.1 ebuild kindly removed the xpm use flag.
> 
> If you read the comments in the 0.5.1/2 ebuilds you'll see that the xpm, png
> and jpeg use flags must *ALL* be disabled to remove background support.
> Disabling only two of them will not disable background support.

I've added xpm use flag. Anyway my point about attaching diff against latest portage version is still valid.
Comment 5 Gautam Iyer 2006-10-04 14:27:58 UTC
Thanks for adding the xpm use flag. I'll send diff's in future,

GI