Bug 147754 – ant-core-1.6.5-r2 builds successfully on PPC with ibm-jdk-bin-1.4.2.6

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Carl Hudkins 2006-09-15 17:06:23 UTC]

Since, after over a year, I still cannot build ant-core-1.6.2, which is still supposedly the stable version, I thought I should report my *success* with 1.6.5 in case that would help getting it marked stable any time soon.  :)

Details:

nenene ~ # java-config -L
*) IBM JDK 1.4.2.6 [ibm-jdk-bin-1.4] (/usr/share/java-config-2/vm/ibm-jdk-bin-1.4)

nenene ~ # emerge --info
Portage 2.1.1 (default-linux/ppc/ppc32/2006.1/G4, gcc-4.1.1, glibc-2.4-r3, 2.6.17-gentoo-r7 ppc)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.17-gentoo-r7 ppc 7400, altivec supported
Gentoo Base System version 1.12.5
Last Sync: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:50:01 +0000
distcc 2.18.3 powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu (protocols 1 and 2) (default port 3632) [enabled]
ccache version 2.3 [enabled]
app-admin/eselect-compiler: [Not Present]
dev-lang/python:     2.4.3-r1
dev-python/pycrypto: 2.0.1-r5
dev-util/ccache:     2.3
dev-util/confcache:  [Not Present]
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.17
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.59-r7
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r2
sys-devel/binutils:  2.16.1-r3
sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.3.13-r3
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.22
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.16
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="ppc"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-O2 -mcpu=G4 -pipe -maltivec -mabi=altivec -mpowerpc-gfxopt"
CHOST="powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/3.5/env /usr/kde/3.5/share/config /usr/kde/3.5/shutdown /usr/share/X11/xkb /usr/share/config"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/env.d /etc/env.d/java/ /etc/gconf /etc/java-config/vms/ /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/terminfo"
CXXFLAGS="-O2 -mcpu=G4 -pipe -maltivec -mabi=altivec -mpowerpc-gfxopt"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoconfig ccache distcc distlocks metadata-transfer sandbox sfperms strict userpriv usersandbox"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://mirror.datapipe.net/gentoo http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/gentoo http://open-systems.ufl.edu/mirrors/gentoo http://gentoo.cites.uiuc.edu/pub/gentoo/"
LC_ALL="en_US.UTF-8"
LINGUAS="en en_US"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/mnt/cdrom"
PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times --compress --force --whole-file --delete --delete-after --stats --timeout=180 --exclude='/distfiles' --exclude='/local' --exclude='/packages'"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.namerica.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="ppc X a52 aac addbookmarks aim alsa altivec apache2 arts berkdb bitmap-fonts bonobo cdr cli crypt css dlloader dri dvd dvdr eds elibc_glibc encode firefox flac gdbm gif gimpprint gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 gtkhtml hal icq idn input_devices_evdev input_devices_joystick input_devices_keyboard input_devices_mouse irc jabber java javascript jbig jikes joystick jpeg jpeg2k kde kdexdeltas kernel_linux ldap libg++ libwww linguas_en linguas_en_US mad mp3 mpeg ncurses nptl nptlonly nsplugin ogg opengl pam pcre pdf perl png python qt qt3 quicktime readline reflection rtc session spell ssl tcpd truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts udev unicode userland_GNU userlocales video_cards_r128 vorbis xml xorg xpm xv xvid yahoo zlib"
Unset:  CTARGET, EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS, INSTALL_MASK, LANG, LDFLAGS, PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS

And, just in case it helps (since locale seems to play a part in some other ant-related bugs):

nenene ~ # locale
LANG=
LC_CTYPE="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_NUMERIC="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_TIME="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_COLLATE="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_MONETARY="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_MESSAGES="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_PAPER="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_NAME="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_ADDRESS="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_TELEPHONE="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_MEASUREMENT="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_IDENTIFICATION="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8

[Comment 1 Wormo (RETIRED) 2006-09-16 11:31:58 UTC]

Java team,

is there any reason we should not stabilize ant-core-1.6.5-r2 as the latest generation 1 ebuild?

[Comment 2 Petteri Räty (RETIRED) 2006-09-16 11:48:25 UTC]

(In reply to comment #1)
> Java team,
> 
> is there any reason we should not stabilize ant-core-1.6.5-r2 as the latest
> generation 1 ebuild?
> 

I don't know any. Has been working fine in ~arch.

[Comment 3 Wormo (RETIRED) 2006-09-16 20:54:46 UTC]

ant-core-1.6.5-r2 now stable on ppc, thanks for the report!