Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 145726 - games-simulation/simutrans new version
Summary: games-simulation/simutrans new version
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Games (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Games
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-08-31 09:59 UTC by Daniel Jakob
Modified: 2006-10-03 14:47 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Simutrans 0.88.10.5 ebuild (simutrans-0.88.10.5.ebuild,1.07 KB, patch)
2006-08-31 10:02 UTC, Daniel Jakob
Details | Diff
ebuild with pak128 USE flag which installs pak128 version (simutrans-0.88.10.5.ebuild,1.23 KB, text/plain)
2006-09-24 02:59 UTC, Thomas Krüger
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Daniel Jakob 2006-08-31 09:59:41 UTC
Made a new ebuild for simutrans version 0.88.10.5. It has been marked as "almost bugfree" by the developers. Released: 02.07.2006
Comment 1 Daniel Jakob 2006-08-31 10:02:06 UTC
Created attachment 95563 [details, diff]
Simutrans 0.88.10.5 ebuild
Comment 2 Thomas Krüger 2006-09-24 02:59:26 UTC
Created attachment 97926 [details]
ebuild with pak128 USE flag which installs pak128 version
Comment 3 Mr. Bones. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-10-01 22:44:01 UTC
Version bumped in portage.  Thanks for the bug report.
Comment 4 Michael Weyershäuser 2006-10-03 09:54:35 UTC
Reopening, I would really like to see the ebuild from comment #2 in portage which supports (via USE flag) the high resolution pak128 version of simutrans. Installed it in an overlay here, emerges and works real nice for me.
Comment 5 Mr. Bones. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-10-03 10:05:16 UTC
That's a different bug.  This one is about a version bump.
Comment 6 Thomas Krüger 2006-10-03 14:47:23 UTC
Sorry, but comment #5 doesn't sound like the most "costumer friendly" answer to me. 
Do I really need to repost my ebuild for bug #95453?