First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 145595
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo's Team for Core System packages <base-system@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Nathan Sullivan <nathan@nightsys.net>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
initng-0.6.7_inotify_ebuild.patch initng-0.6.7 ebuild patch patch Nathan Sullivan 2006-08-30 06:34 0000 678 bytes Details | Diff
initng-inotify-powerpc.patch initng-inotify-powerpc.patch patch Nathan Sullivan 2006-08-30 06:34 0000 579 bytes Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 145595 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 145595 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2006-08-30 06:32 0000
fails due to __ppc__ being renamed to __powerpc__ in recent kernels/headers.
patches to come...

------- Comment #1 From Nathan Sullivan 2006-08-30 06:34:07 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=95476) [edit]
initng-0.6.7 ebuild patch

Ebuild Patch For initng_inotify_powerpc.patch

------- Comment #2 From Nathan Sullivan 2006-08-30 06:34:52 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=95477) [edit]
initng-inotify-powerpc.patch

Patch to use __ppc__ or __powerpc__

------- Comment #3 From Nathan Sullivan 2006-08-30 06:38:54 0000 -------
Spanky, if you end up dealing with this one, might be worth checking out the
-9999 ebuild, to check if its worth epatching for that too. Maybe even lodge
upstream if necessary?

------- Comment #4 From SpanKY 2006-08-30 07:05:51 0000 -------
__ppc__ is never correct

__powerpc__ is set up by the compiler

------- Comment #5 From Nathan Sullivan 2006-08-30 15:06:22 0000 -------
np, care to mod the patch and commit to just use __powerpc__ ? i actually built
my test using just __powerpc__ here...

------- Comment #6 From SpanKY 2006-08-30 19:22:26 0000 -------
ive fixed this in our 0.6.7 ebuild and submitted a bug upstream

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug