The summary has it all. This configure option enables nested groups. A use flag would be nice.
Can you think of an objection against making this --enable-supergroups flag a default for the ebuild? If this configuration-flag incurs e.g. a considerable performance hit, then a use-flag would be useful. If not, then a use-flag could be just useless and dirty.
(In reply to comment #1) > Can you think of an objection against making this --enable-supergroups flag a > default for the ebuild? If this configuration-flag incurs e.g. a considerable > performance hit, then a use-flag would be useful. If not, then a use-flag > could be just useless and dirty. I don't know wether or not there is a performance penalty. I could ask on the openafs mailing list.
(In reply to comment #2) > I don't know wether or not there is a performance penalty. I could ask on the > openafs mailing list. Up to now, I didn't receive an answer on the mailing list. So I'd say: Let's try.
Introduced in 1.4.2fc3, please (re-)emerge that to try this.
(In reply to comment #4) > Introduced in 1.4.2fc3, please (re-)emerge that to try this. Did a quick test, can add one group to another. Thanks a lot.