First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 144997
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Roy Marples (RETIRED) <uberlord@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Chris Bainbridge (RETIRED) <chrb@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 144997 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 144997 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2006-08-24 10:54 0000 
It works for me, and has no (real) outstanding bugs.

------- Comment #1 From Roy Marples (RETIRED) 2006-08-24 11:47:19 0000 ------- 
I have no issue with this either - even though it is the development branch and
0.4.x is the stable branch.

------- Comment #2 From Andrej Kacian (RETIRED) 2006-08-25 03:06:47 0000 ------- 
Wouldn't it be better to stick to upstream regarding "stableness" decision?

Are there some amazing features in 0.5.x for which it would be good to jump
ahead of upstream? 0.4 works for me nicely.

------- Comment #3 From Chris Bainbridge (RETIRED) 2006-08-25 03:47:45 0000 ------- 
I couldn't get 0.4 to connect to one of the access points I use, but that was a
while ago and I haven't retried recently.

------- Comment #4 From Joshua Jackson 2006-08-29 22:09:52 0000 ------- 
I've always had issues with wpa_supplicant past 0.3.9 actually, It never really
worked for me. Course that's probably my own thing, if one of the at's works
their magic with it and its fine I don't have an objection.

However Uberload, its really up to you what you want to do as the maintainer.

------- Comment #5 From Roy Marples (RETIRED) 2006-09-02 11:12:54 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #2)
> Are there some amazing features in 0.5.x for which it would be good to jump
> ahead of upstream? 0.4 works for me nicely.

Features for the end user? no.

However, 0.5.x is more reliable than 0.4.x for some AP configurations. I would
recommend 0.5.4 being marked stable at this time, but we'll keep the 0.4.x
branch in the tree too.

Mark em stable boys!

------- Comment #6 From Andrej Kacian (RETIRED) 2006-09-10 02:44:13 0000 ------- 
0.5.4 works over here nicely, marked stable on x86

------- Comment #7 From Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2006-09-22 06:27:36 0000 ------- 
builds fine, marked stable on amd64

------- Comment #8 From Joe Jezak 2006-09-23 15:52:08 0000 ------- 
Marked ppc stable.

------- Comment #9 From Roy Marples (RETIRED) 2006-09-25 07:47:06 0000 ------- 
Guess it's fixed then
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug