First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 144810
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Tom Knight <tomk@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Daevid Vincent <daevid@daevid.com>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 144810 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 144810 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2006-08-22 19:43 0000 
according to the changelog:

*joe-3.4 (14 Jul 2006)

  22 Dec 2005; Paul Varner <fuzzyray@gentoo.org> joe-3.2.ebuild:
  Stable on x86. Bug #116311

yet this doesn't show as stable.

http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=joe

and according to this:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/joe-editor/

v3.5 is released as of 07/20, yet there doesn't seem to be an ebuild even in
unstable/testing for it.

the 3.2 install i have does not have a ruby.jsf file either. was this added
later?

------- Comment #1 From Jakub Moc 2006-08-22 23:17:33 0000 ------- 
> 22 Dec 2005; Paul Varner <fuzzyray@gentoo.org> joe-3.2.ebuild:
>  Stable on x86. Bug #116311
> yet this doesn't show as stable.

Eh? You need to read changelogs better. 3.4 couldn't be stabilized in Dec 2005
when it's been released and commited in July 2006.

If you want 3.4 stabilized, file a new bug.

------- Comment #2 From Tom Knight 2006-08-23 02:00:39 0000 ------- 
I've just added the joe 3.5 ebuild to cvs, about joe 3.4 there are a few bugs
in it which seem to be fixed in 3.5 so I'd prefer to stabalise 3.5 over 3.4
once it's been tested enough.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug