First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 143662
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Desktop Misc. Team <desktop-misc@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Shogun <shogun713@gmail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
xscreensaver-5.00-get_float_resource.patch Patch to fix the problem patch Shogun 2006-08-12 05:47 0000 502 bytes Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 143662 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 143662 blocks: 136763
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2006-08-12 05:47 0000 
When I try to execute glmatrix, it returns this:

glmatrix: speed must be a float, not 1.0.

so I realized that it badly parses a float option.
I saw the code and I found the problem a fixed it with a patch I attach to this
report.
I've already mailed the author of xscreensaver about this...
Bye guys!
 Shogun

------- Comment #1 From Shogun 2006-08-12 05:47:32 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=94045) [edit]
Patch to fix the problem

------- Comment #2 From Krzysiek Pawlik 2006-09-03 02:52:50 0000 ------- 
Fixed in 5.00-r1, thanks.

------- Comment #3 From Samuli Suominen 2007-06-13 18:53:36 0000 ------- 
jwz, we are also applying this for 5.02 and I'm not sure have you been informed
about it yet. review & comment would be appericiated.

(trying to keep xscreensaver much upstream as possible)

------- Comment #4 From Samuli Suominen 2007-06-13 18:55:32 0000 ------- 
err, missed the part "I've already mailed the author of xscreensaver about
this..."

------- Comment #5 From Jamie Zawinski 2007-06-13 19:01:25 0000 ------- 
That patch is definitely not right.

I vaguely recall seeing this report and fixing it elsewhere, but I can't
remember what I did.  Does it still happen in 5.02 without that patch?

------- Comment #6 From Samuli Suominen 2007-06-13 20:40:48 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #5)
> That patch is definitely not right.

Figured. I've removed it.

> 
> I vaguely recall seeing this report and fixing it elsewhere, but I can't
> remember what I did.  Does it still happen in 5.02 without that patch?
> 

Couldn't reproduce it with 5.02.

Thanks for your time. Again.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug