Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 143459 - sys-libs/db-4.4.20_p2 fails to emerge due to missing patch
Summary: sys-libs/db-4.4.20_p2 fails to emerge due to missing patch
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Library (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Paul de Vrieze (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-08-10 06:31 UTC by Jason Wever (RETIRED)
Modified: 2006-08-10 06:48 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jason Wever (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-08-10 06:31:44 UTC 
As the title states, sys-libs/db-4.4.20_p2 fails to emerge due to a missing patch.  The output from emerge is:

>>> Emerging (1 of 1) sys-libs/db-4.4.20_p2 to /
 * patch.4.4.20.2 size ;-) ...                                            [ ok ]
 * patch.4.4.20.2 RMD160 ;-) ...                                          [ ok ]
 * patch.4.4.20.2 SHA256 ;-) ...                                          [ ok ]
 * patch.4.4.20.2 MD5 ;-) ...                                             [ ok ]
 * db-4.4.20.tar.gz size ;-) ...                                          [ ok ]
 * db-4.4.20.tar.gz RMD160 ;-) ...                                        [ ok ]
 * db-4.4.20.tar.gz SHA256 ;-) ...                                        [ ok ]
 * db-4.4.20.tar.gz MD5 ;-) ...                                           [ ok ]
 * patch.4.4.20.1 size ;-) ...                                            [ ok ]
 * patch.4.4.20.1 RMD160 ;-) ...                                          [ ok ]
 * patch.4.4.20.1 SHA256 ;-) ...                                          [ ok ]
 * patch.4.4.20.1 MD5 ;-) ...                                             [ ok ]
 * checking ebuild checksums ;-) ...                                      [ ok ]
 * checking auxfile checksums ;-) ...                                     [ ok ]
 * checking miscfile checksums ;-) ...                                    [ ok ]
 * checking db-4.4.20.tar.gz ;-) ...                                      [ ok ]
 * checking patch.4.4.20.1 ;-) ...                                        [ ok ]
 * checking patch.4.4.20.2 ;-) ...                                        [ ok ]
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking db-4.4.20.tar.gz to /var/tmp/portage/db-4.4.20_p2/work
 * Applying patch.4.4.20.1 ...                                            [ ok ]
 * Applying patch.4.4.20.2 ...                                            [ ok ]
 * Applying db-4.4-libtool.patch ...                                      [ ok ]
            
 * Cannot find $EPATCH_SOURCE!  Value for $EPATCH_SOURCE is:
 *          
 *   /usr/portage/sys-libs/db/files/db-4.4-jni-check-prefix-first.patch
 *   ( db-4.4-jni-check-prefix-first.patch )
            
            
!!! ERROR: sys-libs/db-4.4.20_p2 failed.
Call stack: 
  ebuild.sh, line 1543:   Called dyn_unpack
  ebuild.sh, line 709:   Called src_unpack
  db-4.4.20_p2.ebuild, line 48:   Called epatch '/usr/portage/sys-libs/db/files/db-4.4-jni-check-prefix-first.patch'
  eutils.eclass, line 190:   Called die
            
!!! Cannot find $EPATCH_SOURCE!
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant.      
            
!!! When you file a bug report, please include the following information:
GENTOO_VM=  CLASSPATH="." JAVA_HOME="/opt/sun-jdk-1.4.2.12"
JAVACFLAGS="" COMPILER=""
and of course, the output of emerge --info


The patch is most definitely not there, there is one with a file name versioned for what appears to be db-4.2 but not db-4.4.  This was found on a ~x86 system that is updated daily and last sync'd around 06:30 UTC today (August 10 2006).  

Let me know if you want emerge info.
Comment 1 Paul de Vrieze (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-08-10 06:48:17 UTC 
Sorry, the ebuild used ${PV} so I didn't see I had to change that. I've now just coded in the proper name of the patches.