First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 143320
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Stefan Schweizer <genstef@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Roman Polach <rpolach@atlas.cz>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 143320 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 143320 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2006-08-09 04:08 0000 
a small fix needed to version number 0.7.1_p20090909
of gnash ebuild: 2009->2006

------- Comment #1 From Stefan Schweizer 2006-08-09 04:32:45 0000 ------- 
well it is supposed to show that this is a cvs ebuild - and 9 fits better for
cvs ebuilds than 6. Thus I took the 9 :)

------- Comment #2 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-08-09 06:10:02 0000 ------- 
Well, 9999 is what's usually used for these...

------- Comment #3 From Stefan Schweizer 2006-08-09 06:21:25 0000 ------- 
jup, and 9999 does not work in this case becase it is not a valid date ..

so I am stuck with 20090909. You could try to change cvs to allow 9999 ;)

------- Comment #4 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-08-30 09:11:24 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 145616 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #5 From Daniel Herzog 2006-08-30 15:39:34 0000 ------- 
I would use 999 or sth like it to be able to see it's cvs before installing and
without looking into the ebuild.
You could define 20090909 as internal Variable.
Code reuseability would be reduce for sure, but that doesnt matter much as you
have two copies and also will not need to change any single line until 09 if
things work out well as they usuall doNT (paradox MS has chosen those two
letters...) :-)

------- Comment #6 From Daniel Herzog 2006-08-30 15:48:19 0000 ------- 
Or, Cant you use "9999.99.99" or at least "9999.12.12" (leave the dots out of
course) - anything more obvious would be nice.
Sorry for double-posting. Pressed commit a second too early.

------- Comment #7 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-09-01 05:18:45 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 145836 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #8 From Stefan Schweizer 2006-09-01 05:26:10 0000 ------- 
reopen to fix

------- Comment #9 From Stefan Schweizer 2006-09-01 05:28:57 0000 ------- 
I renamed it to gnash-0.7.1_p20099999.ebuild and made it conditional in the
ebuild to use it.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug