dev-libs/libffi-3.3.5: attr(depends) uses unstated flags [ build ] dev-libs/libffi-3.3.5: attr(rdepends) uses unstated flags [ build ] dev-libs/libffi-3.3.5: attr(provides) uses unstated flags [ build ] dev-libs/libffi-3.4.1: attr(depends) uses unstated flags [ build ] dev-libs/libffi-3.4.1: attr(rdepends) uses unstated flags [ build ] dev-libs/libffi-3.4.1: attr(provides) uses unstated flags [ build ] dev-libs/libffi-3.4.1-r1: attr(depends) uses unstated flags [ build ] dev-libs/libffi-3.4.1-r1: attr(rdepends) uses unstated flags [ build ] dev-libs/libffi-3.4.1-r1: attr(provides) uses unstated flags [ build ] dev-libs/libffi-3.4.3: attr(depends) uses unstated flags [ build ] dev-libs/libffi-3.4.3: attr(rdepends) uses unstated flags [ build ] dev-libs/libffi-3.4.3: attr(provides) uses unstated flags [ build ]
Since gnustep "was" responsible for 3.3.3 (not in the tree any more), and this thread http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-462949.html suggests that libffi should be used, AND the fact that I already changed this useflag default, I'd like to give this ebuild to the treecleaners project, if you agree, Jakub. At least I assume there is no other package but gnustep-base depending on this package, right?
(In reply to comment #1) > I assume there is no other package but gnustep-base depending on this > package, right? dev-java/sablevm dev-lang/squeak gnustep-base/gnustep-base x11-libs/gtk-server
build was never really used, removed its trails in the ebuilds.
